6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Education of Plainfield Community Consolidated School District No. 202 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Boardgreen2 sentences2008Interpreting this phrase, the appellate court has held that “a person who performs confidential duties on a sporadic basis is still confidential.” Board of Education of Plainfield Community Consolidated School District No. 202 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board (Plainfield), 143 Ill. 2008Interpreting this phrase, the appellate court has held that “a person who performs confidential duties on a sporadic basis is still confidential.” Board of Education of Plainfield Community Consolidated School District No. 202 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, 143 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Niles Township High School District 219 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Boardgreen1 sentence2015Adm. Code, § 1200.135 (2003)), and the Union filed a response. ¶ 44 On February 23, 2015, after reviewing the hearing record, exceptions, and response, the Board issued its final “Decision and Order.” In its written order, the Board adopted the ALJ’s findings that RSAs were not confidential employees, and thus granted the Union’s petition to 3 As we discuss at greater length in section IV of the Analysis, under the labor nexus test, an employee is a “confidential employee” if he or she “in the regular course of his or her duties, assists and acts in a confidential capacity to persons who formu | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chief Judge of the Circuit Court v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31, AFL-CIO
green
2 sentences2006Under the authorized access test, “[s]hould the employee have authorized access to information concerning matters specifically related to the collective-bargaining process between labor and management, the employee is deemed confidential.” Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, 153 Ill. 2d at 523 . 2006Under the authorized access test, “[s]hould the employee have authorized access to information concerning matters specifically related to the collective-bargaining process between labor and management, the employee is deemed confidential.” Chief Judge of the Circuit Court, 153 Ill. 2d at 523 . | 5 | 2006–2012 |
Support Council of District 39 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences2015These facts, however, as considered under Illinois case law, do not support the County’s position that RSAs are confidential employees under the authorized access test. ¶ 72 The County principally relies on Wilmette, 366 Ill. 2008The authorization part is so important that the name of the test is “the authorized access test.” Wilmette, 366 Ill. | 3 | 2008–2015 |
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
green
2 sentences2015App. 3d 58, 71 (2008). 4 As we discuss at greater length in section V of the Analysis, under the authorized access test, an employee is a “confidential employee,” if “in the regular course of his or her duties, [he or she] has authorized access to information relating to the effectuation or review of the employer's collective bargaining policies.” 5 ILCS 315/3(c) (West 2012); American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, 2014 IL App (1st) 132455 , ¶ 34. 11 No. 1-15-0794 add the ten RSA positions to the bargaining unit. ¶ 45 On March 2 2015Authorized Access Test ¶ 67 Under the authorized access test, an employee is a “confidential employee,” if “in the regular course of his or her duties, [he or she] has access to information relating to the effectuation or review of the employer's collective bargaining policies.” 5 ILCS 315/3(c) (West 2012); American Federation, 2014 IL App (1st) 132455, ¶ 34 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.