6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van Molligan v. The Board of Fire & Police Commisioners of the Village of Glenviewgreen2 sentences2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ). 2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ). | 1 | 4 |
Chisem v. McCarthygreen2 sentences2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ). 2023We will not disturb the Board’s determination regarding laches unless it was “so clearly wrong as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Orsa, 2016 IL App (1st) 121709, ¶ 44 ; Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 . ¶ 99 In denying Burg’s motion to dismiss, the Board found laches inapplicable because Burg did not demonstrate that the Superintendent’s delay in bringing charges caused him the requisite prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trusteesgreen1 sentence2022We note that “ ‘there is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities.’ ” Cruz, 2019 IL App (1st) 170915, ¶ 54 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). “[W]hile governmental bodies do not enjoy total immunity from laches, the doctrine is to be applied sparingly against them and only under compelling, unusual[,] or extraordinary circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trustees, 2018 IL App (1st) 171029, ¶ 65 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). | 1 | 1 |
Cruz v. Dartgreen1 sentence2022We note that “ ‘there is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities.’ ” Cruz, 2019 IL App (1st) 170915, ¶ 54 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). “[W]hile governmental bodies do not enjoy total immunity from laches, the doctrine is to be applied sparingly against them and only under compelling, unusual[,] or extraordinary circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trustees, 2018 IL App (1st) 171029, ¶ 65 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). | 1 | 1 |
Pettey v. First National Bank of Genevagreen2 sentences1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers 1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers | 1 | 1 |
Ferretti v. Department of Laborgreen2 sentences1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers 1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hickey v. Illinois Central Railroad
green
2 sentences2019Co. , 35 Ill. 2d 427 , 447-48, 220 N.E.2d 415 (1966) ). ¶ 55 The burden of showing that laches applies is on the party asserting the doctrine. 2019Co. , 35 Ill. 2d 427 , 447-48, 220 N.E.2d 415 (1966) ). ¶ 55 The burden of showing that laches applies is on the party asserting the doctrine. | 2 | 1994–2019 |
Orsa v. The Police Board of the City of Chicago
green
1 sentence2023We will not disturb the Board’s determination regarding laches unless it was “so clearly wrong as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Orsa, 2016 IL App (1st) 121709, ¶ 44 ; Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 . ¶ 99 In denying Burg’s motion to dismiss, the Board found laches inapplicable because Burg did not demonstrate that the Superintendent’s delay in bringing charges caused him the requisite prejudice. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Van Milligan v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW
green
2 sentences2019Notably, however: "There is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown. [Citation.] This is so because laches 'may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials.' " Id. at 90-91, 196 Ill.Dec. 665 , 630 N.E.2d 830 (quoting Hickey v. Illinois Central R.R. 2019Notably, however: "There is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown. [Citation.] This is so because laches 'may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials.' " Id. at 90-91, 196 Ill.Dec. 665 , 630 N.E.2d 830 (quoting Hickey v. Illinois Central R.R. | 1 | 2019–2019 |