laches to the actions of public doctrine (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

laches to the actions of public doctrine in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Van Molligan v. The Board of Fire & Police Commisioners of the Village of Glenviewgreen
ill · 1994 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1999–2023
2 sentences

2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ).

2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ).

14
Chisem v. McCarthygreen
illappct · 2015 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023Our supreme court has recognized there is “considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown.” Van Milligan v. Board of Fire and Police Com’rs of Village of Glenview, 158 Ill. 2d 85, 90 (1994). ¶ 98 “The decision with respect to whether laches should be invoked is generally a discretionary matter.” Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 (citing Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 91 ).

2023We will not disturb the Board’s determination regarding laches unless it was “so clearly wrong as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Orsa, 2016 IL App (1st) 121709, ¶ 44 ; Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 . ¶ 99 In denying Burg’s motion to dismiss, the Board found laches inapplicable because Burg did not demonstrate that the Superintendent’s delay in bringing charges caused him the requisite prejudice.

11
City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trusteesgreen
illappct · 2018 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022We note that “ ‘there is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities.’ ” Cruz, 2019 IL App (1st) 170915, ¶ 54 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). “[W]hile governmental bodies do not enjoy total immunity from laches, the doctrine is to be applied sparingly against them and only under compelling, unusual[,] or extraordinary circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trustees, 2018 IL App (1st) 171029, ¶ 65 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ).

11
Cruz v. Dartgreen
illappct · 2019 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022We note that “ ‘there is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities.’ ” Cruz, 2019 IL App (1st) 170915, ¶ 54 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ). “[W]hile governmental bodies do not enjoy total immunity from laches, the doctrine is to be applied sparingly against them and only under compelling, unusual[,] or extraordinary circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trustees, 2018 IL App (1st) 171029, ¶ 65 (quoting Van Milligan, 158 Ill. 2d at 90 ).

11
Pettey v. First National Bank of Genevagreen
illappct · 1992 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers

1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers

11
Ferretti v. Department of Laborgreen
ill · 1987 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers

1994Co. (1966), 35 Ill.2d 427, 447 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) This is so because laches "may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials." ( Hickey, 35 Ill.2d at 447-48 , 220 N.E.2d 415 .) Although "the reluctance to apply equitable principles * * * does not amount to absolute immunity * * * from laches and estoppel under all circumstances," it has been recognized that laches does not apply to the exercise of governmental powers

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Hickey v. Illinois Central Railroad green
ill · 1966
2 sentences

2019Co. , 35 Ill. 2d 427 , 447-48, 220 N.E.2d 415 (1966) ). ¶ 55 The burden of showing that laches applies is on the party asserting the doctrine.

2019Co. , 35 Ill. 2d 427 , 447-48, 220 N.E.2d 415 (1966) ). ¶ 55 The burden of showing that laches applies is on the party asserting the doctrine.

21994–2019
Orsa v. The Police Board of the City of Chicago green
illappct · 2016
1 sentence

2023We will not disturb the Board’s determination regarding laches unless it was “so clearly wrong as to constitute an abuse of discretion.” Orsa, 2016 IL App (1st) 121709, ¶ 44 ; Chisem, 2014 IL App (1st) 132389, ¶ 18 . ¶ 99 In denying Burg’s motion to dismiss, the Board found laches inapplicable because Burg did not demonstrate that the Superintendent’s delay in bringing charges caused him the requisite prejudice.

12023–2023
Van Milligan v. BD. OF FIRE & POLICE COM'RS OF VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW green
ill · 1994
2 sentences

2019Notably, however: "There is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown. [Citation.] This is so because laches 'may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials.' " Id. at 90-91, 196 Ill.Dec. 665 , 630 N.E.2d 830 (quoting Hickey v. Illinois Central R.R.

2019Notably, however: "There is considerable reluctance to impose the doctrine of laches to the actions of public entities unless unusual or extraordinary circumstances are shown. [Citation.] This is so because laches 'may impair the functioning of the [governmental body] in the discharge of its government functions, and * * * valuable public interests may be jeopardized or lost by the negligence, mistakes, or inattention of public officials.' " Id. at 90-91, 196 Ill.Dec. 665 , 630 N.E.2d 830 (quoting Hickey v. Illinois Central R.R.

12019–2019

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check