complained-of instruction in Kansas

6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Smithgreen kan · 1978 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982 2 sentences 1982See State v. Smith, 223 Kan. 294 , 574 P.2d 161 (1978); State v. Jordan, 223 Kan. 197 , 574 P.2d 194 (1977). 1982See State v. Smith, 223 Kan. 294 , 574 P.2d 161 (1978); State v. Jordan, 223 Kan. 197 , 574 P.2d 194 (1977).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Moore green kan · 2024 1 sentence 2026State v. Moore, 319 Kan. 557 , 565-66, 556 P.3d 466 (2024).	1	2026–2026
State v. Williams green kan · 2012 2 sentences 2019K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 22-3414(3) ; State v. Williams , 295 Kan. 506 , Syl. ¶ 3, 286 P.3d 195 (2012). 2019K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 22-3414(3) ; State v. Williams , 295 Kan. 506 , Syl. ¶ 3, 286 P.3d 195 (2012).	1	2019–2019
State v. Santos-Vega green kan · 2014 2 sentences 2019State v. Santos-Vega , 299 Kan. 11 , 23, 321 P.3d 1 (2014). 2019State v. Santos-Vega , 299 Kan. 11 , 23, 321 P.3d 1 (2014).	1	2019–2019
State v. Walker green kan · 1993 1 sentence 2005It stated in part: “[I]n the case of certain crimes called specific intent crimes, if the jury believes from all the facts and circumstances that defendant was intoxicated, and that tire intoxication was to such a degree that defendant’s mental faculties were impaired, and that such impairment was to such an extent that the defendant was incapable of forming the specific intent which is an element of the crime, that is, if the defendant ‘was utterly devoid of consciousness or awareness’ of what he was doing *371 then the jury may take that fact into consideration in determining whether or not	1	2005–2005
Apprendi v. New Jersey green scotus · 2000 2 sentences 2003The great bodily harm instruction in the present case was formatted as suggested in the introduction of PIK Crim. 3d 53.00: “ ‘As used in these instructions, the term _(means) (includes)_ Brice also argues that the complained-of instruction removed a required element from the case in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L. 2003The great bodily harm instruction in the present case was formatted as suggested in the introduction of PIK Crim. 3d 53.00: “ ‘As used in these instructions, the term _(means) (includes)_ Brice also argues that the complained-of instruction removed a required element from the case in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 147 L.	1	2003–2003
State v. Jordan green kan · 1977 2 sentences 1982See State v. Smith, 223 Kan. 294 , 574 P.2d 161 (1978); State v. Jordan, 223 Kan. 197 , 574 P.2d 194 (1977). 1982See State v. Smith, 223 Kan. 294 , 574 P.2d 161 (1978); State v. Jordan, 223 Kan. 197 , 574 P.2d 194 (1977).	1	1982–1982

Where else courts name it

TX 166 (1986–2026) IL 41 (1951–2024) CA 28 (1970–2025) LA 21 (1997–2026) FL 15 (1976–2021) GA 8 (1983–2021) MI 7 (1974–2025) AL 7 (1992–2011) KS 6 (1982–2026) MO 5 (1977–2018) NV 4 (2013–2022) PA 4 (1973–2022) KY 3 (1993–2024) OR 3 (1978–2025) OH 2 (1986–2003) WY 2 (1981–1982) ID 2 (2016–2020) OK 2 (1960–1962) IN 2 (1995–2016) DC 2 (2023–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check