6 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2009See State v. Davis, 283 Kan. 569, 583 , 158 P.3d 317 (2007). 2009See State v. Davis, 283 Kan. 569, 583 , 158 P.3d 317 (2007). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2009See State v. Davis, 283 Kan. 569, 583 , 158 P.3d 317 (2007). 2009See State v. Davis, 283 Kan. 569, 583 , 158 P.3d 317 (2007). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Houstongreen2 sentences2020State v. Houston, 289 Kan. 252, 277 , 213 P.3d 728 (2009) ("The presence of one error is obviously insufficient to accumulate."). 2020State v. Houston, 289 Kan. 252, 277 , 213 P.3d 728 (2009) ("The presence of one error is obviously insufficient to accumulate."). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.