6 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Globe Life Insurancegreen2 sentences2026Indeed, in Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999), the Supreme Court stated: We take this occasion to note that a number of recent decisions from this Court and the Court of Appeals have, in reviewing motions for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), erroneously applied standards derived from Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363 ; 207 NW2d 316 (1973). 2026Indeed, in Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999), the Supreme Court stated: We take this occasion to note that a number of recent decisions from this Court and the Court of Appeals have, in reviewing motions for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), erroneously applied standards derived from Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363 ; 207 NW2d 316 (1973). | 3 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rizzo v. Kretschmer
green
2 sentences2026Indeed, in Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999), the Supreme Court stated: We take this occasion to note that a number of recent decisions from this Court and the Court of Appeals have, in reviewing motions for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), erroneously applied standards derived from Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363 ; 207 NW2d 316 (1973). 2026Indeed, in Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999), the Supreme Court stated: We take this occasion to note that a number of recent decisions from this Court and the Court of Appeals have, in reviewing motions for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10), erroneously applied standards derived from Rizzo v Kretschmer, 389 Mich 363 ; 207 NW2d 316 (1973). | 3 | 2023–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.