6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanksgreen2 sentences2012The violation of a statute “gives rise to negligence per se if the persons harmed by that violation are within the intended protection of the statute and the harm suffered is of the type the legislation was intended to protect.” Alderman’s Inc. v. Shanks, 536 N.W.2d 4, 8 (Minn.1995) (quotation omitted). 1996In Alderman’s Inc. v. Shanks, 536 N.W.2d 4 (Minn.1995), we held “that breach of a statute gives rise to negligence per se if the persons harmed by that violation are within the intended protection of the statute, and the harm suffered is of the type the legislation was intended to prevent.” Id. at 8 (original emphasis)(quoting Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548 (Minn.1977)). | 3 | 3 |
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.red2 sentences1996In Alderman’s Inc. v. Shanks, 536 N.W.2d 4 (Minn.1995), we held “that breach of a statute gives rise to negligence per se if the persons harmed by that violation are within the intended protection of the statute, and the harm suffered is of the type the legislation was intended to prevent.” Id. at 8 (original emphasis)(quoting Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548 (Minn.1977)). 1994Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548, 558 (Minn.1977): [Bjreach of a statute gives rise to negligence per se if the persons harmed by that violation are within the intended protection' of the statute and the harm suffered is of the type the legislation was intended to prevent. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Osborne v. McMasters
green
2 sentences1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). 1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Dart v. Pure Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). 1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Zerby v. Warren
green
2 sentences1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). 1981Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , 41 N.W. 543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , 27 N.W.2d 555 (1947); Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , 210 N.W.2d 58 (1973). | 2 | 1977–1981 |