6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1894–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Inf. Taylor v. American Ins. Co.green2 sentences1989State on Inf. of Taylor v. American Insurance Co., 355 Mo. 1053 , 200 S.W.2d 1, 53 (1946). 1989State on Inf. of Taylor v. American Insurance Co., 355 Mo. 1053 , 200 S.W.2d 1, 53 (1946). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michigan v. Tyler
green
2 sentences1984For a thorough treatment of Epperson and a fine analysis of Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978) and Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 , 98 S.Ct. 1942 , 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978) and their impact on warrant-less searches, see Note, Warrantless Murder Scene Searches in the Aftermath of Mincy v. Arizona, 58 Wash.U.L.Q. 367 (1980). 1984For a thorough treatment of Epperson and a fine analysis of Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978) and Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 , 98 S.Ct. 1942 , 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978) and their impact on warrant-less searches, see Note, Warrantless Murder Scene Searches in the Aftermath of Mincy v. Arizona, 58 Wash.U.L.Q. 367 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Mincey v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1984For a thorough treatment of Epperson and a fine analysis of Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978) and Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 , 98 S.Ct. 1942 , 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978) and their impact on warrant-less searches, see Note, Warrantless Murder Scene Searches in the Aftermath of Mincy v. Arizona, 58 Wash.U.L.Q. 367 (1980). 1984For a thorough treatment of Epperson and a fine analysis of Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 , 98 S.Ct. 2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978) and Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 , 98 S.Ct. 1942 , 56 L.Ed.2d 486 (1978) and their impact on warrant-less searches, see Note, Warrantless Murder Scene Searches in the Aftermath of Mincy v. Arizona, 58 Wash.U.L.Q. 367 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Van Horn
green
1 sentence1982State v. Van Horn, 625 S.W.2d 874 (Mo.1981), decided December 14, holds that in structing a jury of the punishment it might assess without mentioning a fine is not error. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Thunder Oil Company v. City of Sunset Hills
green
2 sentences1968Imprisonment for nonpayment of a fine for violation of the ordinance by failing to file a return would not constitute imprisonment for debt, Thunder Oil Company v. City of Sunset Hills, (Mo.Sup.banc) 349 S.W.2d 82, 89 . 1968Imprisonment for nonpayment of a fine for violation of the ordinance by failing to file a return would not constitute imprisonment for debt, Thunder Oil Company v. City of Sunset Hills, (Mo. Sup.banc) 349 S.W.2d 82, 89 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
City of St. Louis v. Sternberg
neutral
1 sentence1934Louis v. Sternberg, 69 Mo. 289 , the defendant appealed from a judgment imposing a fine for violation of an ordinance requiring persons practicing law to obtain a license and to pay the city collector $25 annually therefor. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Ex parte Hollwedell
green
1 sentence1894In Ex Parte Hollwedell, 74 Mo. 395 , it is held that the violation of a city ordinance is not a criminal offence within the meaning of the constitution, and that a proceeding by a city to recover a fine for the violation of such ordinance need not be by indictment or information in the name of the stale. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
City of Kansas v. Clark
green
1 sentence1894City of Kansas v. Clark, 68 Mo. 588 ; City of St. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.