6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1885–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hunter v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 742-46 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Ragan v. McElroy
neutral
1 sentence1957In the cases cited by defendants (Ragan v. McElroy, 98 Mo. 349 , 11 S.W. 73S; Foote v. Clark, 102 Mo. 394 , 14 S.W. 981 , 11 L.R.A. 861 ; Rumsey v. Otis, 133 Mo. 85 , 34 S.W. 551 ) land was “descended or devised” to the parties involved, so they are not in point on estop-pel of one who takes by purchase. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Foote v. Clark
green
1 sentence1957In the cases cited by defendants (Ragan v. McElroy, 98 Mo. 349 , 11 S.W. 73S; Foote v. Clark, 102 Mo. 394 , 14 S.W. 981 , 11 L.R.A. 861 ; Rumsey v. Otis, 133 Mo. 85 , 34 S.W. 551 ) land was “descended or devised” to the parties involved, so they are not in point on estop-pel of one who takes by purchase. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Rumsey v. Otis
green
2 sentences1957In the cases cited by defendants (Ragan v. McElroy, 98 Mo. 349 , 11 S.W. 73S; Foote v. Clark, 102 Mo. 394 , 14 S.W. 981 , 11 L.R.A. 861 ; Rumsey v. Otis, 133 Mo. 85 , 34 S.W. 551 ) land was “descended or devised” to the parties involved, so they are not in point on estop-pel of one who takes by purchase. 1957In the cases cited by defendants (Ragan v. McElroy, 98 Mo. 349 , 11 S.W. 73S; Foote v. Clark, 102 Mo. 394 , 14 S.W. 981 , 11 L.R.A. 861 ; Rumsey v. Otis, 133 Mo. 85 , 34 S.W. 551 ) land was “descended or devised” to the parties involved, so they are not in point on estop-pel of one who takes by purchase. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Stevens v. Tucker
green
1 sentence1920Stephens v. Tucker, 87 Ind. 109 , shows that the *124 right to recover from the heirs when the claim came into being after the estate was closed does not depend on a special statute to that effect. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Spradling v. Conway
neutral
1 sentence1907To be a bar to another action, there must be a judgment on the merits.” And so is the holding in Spradling v. Conway, 51 Mo. 51 , and other Missouri cases. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Baldwin v. Davidson
neutral
1 sentence1907In Baldwin v. Davidson, 139 Mo. 118 , it was held: “A voluntary dismissal of an appeal from the probate court by the heirs is no bar to a subsequent suit in equity by them to surcharge and falsify the accounts of the administrator and to set aside the judgment of the probate court. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
State ex rel. Midgett v. Matson
neutral
1 sentence1894State to use v. Campbell, 10 Mo. 726 ; State to use v. Stephenson, 12 Mo. 180; State to use v. Morton, 18 Mo. 54 ; State ex rel. v. Matson, 44 Mo. 305 ; State to use v. Thornton, 56 Mo. 325 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
State ex rel. Kelley v. Thornton
neutral
1 sentence1894State to use v. Campbell, 10 Mo. 726 ; State to use v. Stephenson, 12 Mo. 180; State to use v. Morton, 18 Mo. 54 ; State ex rel. v. Matson, 44 Mo. 305 ; State to use v. Thornton, 56 Mo. 325 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Hanenkamp's Administrator v. Borgmier
neutral
1 sentence1885Personal property must be administered on before the heirs can claim their distribution shares.” Vide Hanenkamp’s Admr. v. Bergmier, 32 Mo. 569 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.