6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vinsongreen2 sentences2005Where the defendant fails to establish that the procedures were unduly suggestive, the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test “go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility.” Vinson, 800 S.W.2d at 446 . 1997Vinson, 800 S.W.2d at 446 (Mo. banc 1990). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Chambersgreen1 sentence2018See State v. Chambers , 234 S.W.3d 501 , 514 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) ; State v. Glover , 951 S.W.2d 359 , 363-64 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997) (if movant fails to establish that police procedures were unduly suggestive, "the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Glover
green
2 sentences2018See State v. Chambers , 234 S.W.3d 501 , 514 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) ; State v. Glover , 951 S.W.2d 359 , 363-64 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997) (if movant fails to establish that police procedures were unduly suggestive, "the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility."). 2007If Mr. McElvain fails “to establish that police procedures were unduly suggestive, the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility.” Id. at 364 . | 2 | 2007–2018 |
State v. McElvain
green
2 sentences2011“If [the Appellant] fails to establish that police procedures were unduly suggestive, the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility.” Id. 2008Because Mr. Allen failed to demonstrate that the police used procedures that were unduly suggestive, ‘“the factors considered in the reliability prong of the test go to the weight of the identifications and not to their admissibility.’ ” Id. (citation omitted). | 2 | 2008–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.