6 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Shannahangreen2 sentences2010This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.” Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App. 2004); see Selberg, 201 S.W.3d at 515 . 2009This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.’” Pattie v. French Quarter Resorts, 213 S.W.3d 237, 239 (Mo.App.2007) (quoting Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App.2004)). *169 Nevertheless, our review of the transcript and legal file discloses why Defendants were unable to comply with this rule; the record is void of any evidence supporting these assertions. | 3 | 3 |
Selberg v. Selberggreen2 sentences2010This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.” Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App. 2004); see Selberg, 201 S.W.3d at 515 . 2007This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.” Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App.2004); see Selberg v. Selberg, 201 S.W.3d 513, 515 (Mo.App.2006). | 2 | 2 |
Pattie v. French Quarter Resortsgreen2 sentences2009This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.’” Pattie v. French Quarter Resorts, 213 S.W.3d 237, 239 (Mo.App.2007) (quoting Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App.2004)). *169 Nevertheless, our review of the transcript and legal file discloses why Defendants were unable to comply with this rule; the record is void of any evidence supporting these assertions. 2007“Compliance with this subpart of the rule 'is mandatory and essential for the effective functioning of appellate courts, which cannot spend time searching the record to determine if factual assertions are supported by the record.’" Pattie v. French Quarter Resorts, 213 S.W.3d 237, 239 (Mo.App.2007). | 2 | 2 |
Yates v. Briggs & Strattongreen1 sentence2010This would effectively require the court to act as an advocate for the non-complying party, a role which we expressly decline.” Yates v. Briggs & Stratton, 302 S.W.3d 776, 777-78 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duncan v. Duncan
green
1 sentence2009Id. 5 The trial court’s ruling on the motion is treated as an independent judgment. | 1 | 2009–2009 |