sufficient independent inquiry (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

sufficient independent inquiry in Missouri

6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Moore v. Stategreen
mo · 1996 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2014–2016
2 sentences

2016Id. at 229 . 'When this presumption arises, “a motion court must conduct a sufficient independent inquiry of a post-conviction movant’s claim ’of abandonment.” Id., citing McDaris v. State, 843 S.W.2d 369 , 371 n.1 (Mo. banc 1992); Moore v. State, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 (Mo. banc 1996). [T]he trial court should ... inquire not only of postconviction counsel,- but ensure that movant is- informed of counsel’s response and given an opportunity to reply.

2014Moore, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 ; McDaris, 843 S.W.2d at 371 n. 1.

12
Pollard v. Stategreen
mo · 1991 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Luleff, 807 S.W.2d at 498; Crenshaw v. State, 266 S.W.3d 257, 259 (Mo.banc 2008) (holding that where a mov-ant has been abandoned by post-conviction counsel, “the proper remedy is to put the movant in the place where the movant would have been if the abandonment had not occurred”).

11
Crenshaw v. Stategreen
mo · 2008 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Luleff, 807 S.W.2d at 498; Crenshaw v. State, 266 S.W.3d 257, 259 (Mo.banc 2008) (holding that where a mov-ant has been abandoned by post-conviction counsel, “the proper remedy is to put the movant in the place where the movant would have been if the abandonment had not occurred”).

11
Charles K. Moore v. State of Missourigreen
mo · 2015 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Moore, 458 S.W.3d at 825 ; Vogl, 437 S.W.3d at 229 . [W]hen the record raises a presumption of abandonment because appointed counsel has failed to comply with the requirements in Rule 24.035(e) that counsel filé-a timely amended motion' or a statement setting out facts that demonstrate counsel’s actions to ensure no amended motion is needed, a motion court must conduct a sufficient independent inquiry of a post-conviction mov-ant’s claim of abandonment.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Mark D. Vogl v. State of Missouri green
mo · 2014
2 sentences

2018Perkins nonetheless argues that appointed counsel's statement in lieu, though timely filed, created a presumption of abandonment because it otherwise failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 24.035(e). "[W]hen the record raises a presumption of abandonment because appointed counsel has failed to comply with the requirements in Rule 24.035(e) ... a motion court must conduct a sufficient independent inquiry of a postconviction movant's claim of abandonment." Vogl , 437 S.W.3d at 229 .

2016Id. at 229 . 'When this presumption arises, “a motion court must conduct a sufficient independent inquiry of a post-conviction movant’s claim ’of abandonment.” Id., citing McDaris v. State, 843 S.W.2d 369 , 371 n.1 (Mo. banc 1992); Moore v. State, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 (Mo. banc 1996). [T]he trial court should ... inquire not only of postconviction counsel,- but ensure that movant is- informed of counsel’s response and given an opportunity to reply.

42015–2018
McDaris v. State green
mo · 1992
2 sentences

2016Id. at 229 . 'When this presumption arises, “a motion court must conduct a sufficient independent inquiry of a post-conviction movant’s claim ’of abandonment.” Id., citing McDaris v. State, 843 S.W.2d 369 , 371 n.1 (Mo. banc 1992); Moore v. State, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 (Mo. banc 1996). [T]he trial court should ... inquire not only of postconviction counsel,- but ensure that movant is- informed of counsel’s response and given an opportunity to reply.

2014Moore, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 ; McDaris, 843 S.W.2d at 371 n. 1.

22014–2016

Where else courts name it

MO 6 (2014–2018) NY 2 (2017–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check