collateral estoppel must never be seen doctrine (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

collateral estoppel must never be seen doctrine in Mississippi

6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
MESC v. Philadelphia Mun. Sep. Sch. D.green
miss · 1983 · cited in 6 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1992–2002
2 sentences

2002Dist., 437 So.2d 388, 397 (Miss.1983), this Court stated "The doctrine of collateral estoppel must never be seen as anything other than an unusual exception to the general rule that all fact questions should be litigated fully in each case," and "[w]here there is room for suspicion regarding the reliability of those first fact findings, collateral estoppel should never be applied." ¶ 9.

2000Dist., 437 So.2d 388, 397 (Miss.1983), this Court stated The doctrine of collateral estoppel must never be seen as anything other than an unusual exception to the general rule that all fact questions should be litigated fully in each case," and "[w]here there is room for suspicion regarding the reliability of those first fact findings, collateral estoppel should never be applied." ¶9.

66

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check