6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dianne Truddle v. Baptist Memorial Hospital-Desoto, Inc.green2 sentences2018Truddle, 150 So. 3d at 697 (¶17) (quoting Shamburger, 84 F. Supp. 2d at 798 ). 2017Truddle, 150 So. 3d at 697 (¶17) (quoting Shamburger, 84 F. Supp. 2d at 798 ). | 2 | 2 |
Cattenhead v. Brantleygreen1 sentence2018See Cattenhead v. Brantley, 119 So. 3d 1136, 1141 (¶13) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shamburger v. Grand Casino of Mississippi, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Truddle, 150 So. 3d at 697 (¶17) (quoting Shamburger, 84 F. Supp. 2d at 798 ). 2017Truddle, 150 So. 3d at 697 (¶17) (quoting Shamburger, 84 F. Supp. 2d at 798 ). | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Memorial Hospital at Gulfport v. Barry G. White
green
1 sentence2019White , 170 So.3d at 508 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Thompson v. Carter
green
1 sentence2009However, under our de novo review of the trial court’s decision, we find that the medical negligence claim was properly dismissed because Dr. Frenz was not qualified to testify as an expert pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702. *758 While the supreme court in Thompson held that a medical license is not the sine qua non to qualify as an expert in a medical negligence action, the opinion referenced Rule 702 and clarified that, “[s]imply put, before one may testify as an expert, that person must be shown to know a great deal regarding the subject of his testimony.” Thompson , 518 So.2d at | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Bellamy v. Appellate Department
green
2 sentences2008In Bellamy v. Appellate Department, the plaintiff was injured when she fell off an x-ray table while “either in preparation for, during, or after an [x]-ray exam or treatment.” 50 Cal.App.4th 797, 805 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 894 (Cal.Ct.App.1996). 2008In Bellamy v. Appellate Department, the plaintiff was injured when she fell off an x-ray table while “either in preparation for, during, or after an [x]-ray exam or treatment.” 50 Cal.App.4th 797, 805 , 57 Cal.Rptr.2d 894 (Cal.Ct.App.1996). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Corbo v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2008The court in that case concluded that instead of being simple negligence, “[t]he fact that injury was caused by the use of the equipment during the rendering of medical treatment [took] Garcia’s claim into the realm of a medical negligence claim.” Id. at 370 . ¶ 12. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.