defendant breached the applicable standard (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

defendant breached the applicable standard in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Goins v. Puleogreen
nc · 1999 · cited in 3 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2009–2017
2 sentences

2017"One of the essential elements of a claim for medical negligence is that the defendant breached the applicable standard of medical care owed to the plaintiff." *614 Goins v. Puleo , 350 N.C. 277 , 281, 512 S.E.2d 748 , 751 (1999).

2017"One of the essential elements of a claim for medical negligence is that the defendant breached the applicable standard of medical care owed to the plaintiff." *614 Goins v. Puleo , 350 N.C. 277 , 281, 512 S.E.2d 748 , 751 (1999).

23
Crocker v. Roethlinggreen
nc · 2009 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017"Plaintiffs must establish the relevant standard of care through expert testimony." Crocker v. Roethling , 363 N.C. 140 , 142, 675 S.E.2d 625 , 628 (2009) (citations omitted).

2017"Plaintiffs must establish the relevant standard of care through expert testimony." Crocker v. Roethling , 363 N.C. 140 , 142, 675 S.E.2d 625 , 628 (2009) (citations omitted).

12
Barber v. Presbyterian Hospitalgreen
ncctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002See Barber v. Presbyterian Hosp., 147 N.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Ballenger v. Crowell green
· 1978
2 sentences

1988Ballenger v. Crowell, 38 N.C.

1988Ballenger v. Crowell, 38 N.C.

21988–1988

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.12 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1991–2021) NC 6 (1988–2017) MS 5 (2006–2015) VT 4 (2018–2021) VA 2 (2006–2016) AZ 2 (1995–2017) MI 2 (2017–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check