6 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Albritton v. Albrittongreen2 sentences2026App. 154 , 165, 834 S.E.2d 700 , 708 (2019) (“The spouse asserting the claim for alimony has the burden of proving dependency.”); Albritton v. Albritton, 109 N.C. 2026App. 154 , 165, 834 S.E.2d 700 , 708 (2019) (“The spouse asserting the claim for alimony has the burden of proving dependency.”); Albritton v. Albritton, 109 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
Williamson v. Williamsongreen2 sentences2019Williamson v. Williamson, 217 N.C. 2012App _, _ 719 S.E.2d 625, 627 (2011) (quoting Loflin v. Loflin, 25 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Loflin v. Loflin
green
2 sentences2012App _, _ 719 S.E.2d 625, 627 (2011) (quoting Loflin v. Loflin, 25 N.C. 2011We reject Defendant’s contention that Plaintiff had the burden of presenting evidence of his income because “[t]he burden of proving dependency is upon the spouse asserting the claim for alimony[.]” Loflin v. Loflin, 25 N.C. | 2 | 2011–2012 |
Mims v. Mims
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 56-57 , 286 S.E.2d at 789-90 . 2010Id. at 56-57 , 286 S.E.2d at 789-90 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.