6 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tuttlegreen2 sentences2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). 2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Lottergreen2 sentences2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). 2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lottergreen2 sentences2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). 2001(Citations omitted.) “ ‘[Discovery in a criminal case is generally, and in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or court rule.’ ” State v. Lotter, 255 Neb. 456, 490 , 586 N.W.2d 591, 618 (1998), modified 255 Neb. 889 , 587 N.W.2d 673 *817 (1999) (quoting State v. Tuttle, 238 Neb. 827 , 472 N.W.2d 712 (1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Phelps
green
2 sentences2008However, the State is not under a constitutional duty to disclose all information that might affect the jury’s verdict, State v. Phelps, 241 Neb. 707 , 490 N.W.2d 676 (1992), and discovery in a criminal case is, in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or a court rule, id. 2008However, the State is not under a constitutional duty to disclose all information that might affect the jury’s verdict, State v. Phelps, 241 Neb. 707 , 490 N.W.2d 676 (1992), and discovery in a criminal case is, in the absence of a constitutional requirement, controlled by either a statute or a court rule, id. | 2 | 2007–2008 |
State v. Kinney
green
2 sentences2007State v. Kinney, 262 Neb. 812 , 635 N.W.2d 449 (2001). 2007State v. Kinney, 262 Neb. 812 , 635 N.W.2d 449 (2001). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Tylle v. Zoucha
green
1 sentence1998Eschewing, upon more mature reflection, the references to the legislative record made in my concurrence in Tylle v. Zoucha, 226 Neb. 476 , 412 N.W.2d *336 438 (1987), see, e.g., Southern Neb. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.