Gentry rule in Nevada

6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCred cal · 2014 · cited in 4 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015In its view, "the fact that Gentry's rule against class waiver is stated more narrowly than Discover Bank's rule does not save it from FAA preemption under Concepcion." Id. at 135 . 2015In its view, "the fact that Gentry's rule against class waiver is stated more narrowly than Discover Bank's rule does not save it from FAA preemption under Concepcion." Id. at 135 .	4	4

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark green nev · 1988 2 sentences 2013In support of its argument, Aspen primarily relies on Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 104 Nev. 508 , 761 P.2d 849 (1988), overruled on other grounds by Diaz, 116 Nev. at 100-01, 993 P.2d at 58 , in which the court noted its concern that no party claiming the privilege in that case had sworn to the facts supporting the claim in an affidavit. 2013In support of its argument, Aspen primarily relies on Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 104 Nev. 508 , 761 P.2d 849 (1988), overruled on other grounds by Diaz, 116 Nev. at 100-01, 993 P.2d at 58 , in which the court noted its concern that no party claiming the privilege in that case had sworn to the facts supporting the claim in an affidavit.	1	2013–2013
Diaz v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada green nev · 2000 1 sentence 2013In support of its argument, Aspen primarily relies on Las Vegas Sun, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 104 Nev. 508 , 761 P.2d 849 (1988), overruled on other grounds by Diaz, 116 Nev. at 100-01, 993 P.2d at 58 , in which the court noted its concern that no party claiming the privilege in that case had sworn to the facts supporting the claim in an affidavit.	1	2013–2013
Homewood Inv. Co., Inc. v. Moses green nev · 1980 1 sentence 1981In Homewood Investment Co. v. Moses, supra, at 330 , 608 P.2d at 506 , we rejected Gentry’s claim because the indemnification agreement did not require perfection of available liens as a condition precedent to collection of the amounts due.	1	1981–1981

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 34.170 (5) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.206 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.219 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.018 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.250 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.151 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.157 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.201-219 (4) USC § 29u.s.c.216 (4) USC § 9u.s.c.2 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 35 (2011–2026) NV 6 (1981–2015) WA 3 (2010–2015) AR 2 (2009–2022) KY 2 (1969–2020) AL 2 (1996–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check