6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Green v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Green 119 Nev. at 545 , 80 P.3d at 95 ; Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 462 , 488 P.2d 1161, 1163-64 (1971) (the defendant's failure to specifically object on the grounds urged on appeal precluded appellate consideration of those grounds). 2013See Green 119 Nev. at 545 , 80 P.3d at 95 ; Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 462 , 488 P.2d 1161, 1163-64 (1971) (the defendant's failure to specifically object on the grounds urged on appeal precluded appellate consideration of those grounds). | 2 | 2 |
Garner v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Garner v. State, 116 Nev. 770 , 783, 6 P.3d 1013, 1022 (2000), overruled on other grounds by Sharma v. State, 118 Nev. 648 , 56 P.3d 868 (2002). 2016Garner, 116 Nev. at 783, 6 P.3d at 1022 . | 1 | 1 |
Truesdell v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Truesdell v. State, 129 Nev. „ 304 P.3d 396, 403 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Merica v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Green 119 Nev. at 545 , 80 P.3d at 95 ; Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 462 , 488 P.2d 1161, 1163-64 (1971) (the defendant's failure to specifically object on the grounds urged on appeal precluded appellate consideration of those grounds). 2013See Green 119 Nev. at 545 , 80 P.3d at 95 ; Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 462 , 488 P.2d 1161, 1163-64 (1971) (the defendant's failure to specifically object on the grounds urged on appeal precluded appellate consideration of those grounds). | 1 | 1 |
Lioce v. Cohengreen1 sentence2012NRS 47.040(2); see Lioce v. Cohen, 124 Nev. 1, 19 , 173 P.3d 970, 981-82 (2008) (recognizing that this court may review unobjected-to attorney misconduct for plain error on appeal relating to a motion for new trial); see also Bradley v. Romeo, 102 Nev. 103, 105 , 716 P.2d 227, 228 (1986) (“The ability of this court to consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error is well established.”); 5 Am. | 1 | 1 |
Bradley v. Romeogreen2 sentences2012NRS 47.040(2); see Lioce v. Cohen, 124 Nev. 1, 19 , 173 P.3d 970, 981-82 (2008) (recognizing that this court may review unobjected-to attorney misconduct for plain error on appeal relating to a motion for new trial); see also Bradley v. Romeo, 102 Nev. 103, 105 , 716 P.2d 227, 228 (1986) (“The ability of this court to consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error is well established.”); 5 Am. 2012NRS 47.040(2); see Lioce v. Cohen, 124 Nev. 1, 19 , 173 P.3d 970, 981-82 (2008) (recognizing that this court may review unobjected-to attorney misconduct for plain error on appeal relating to a motion for new trial); see also Bradley v. Romeo, 102 Nev. 103, 105 , 716 P.2d 227, 228 (1986) (“The ability of this court to consider relevant issues sua sponte in order to prevent plain error is well established.”); 5 Am. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sharma v. State
green
2 sentences2016Garner v. State, 116 Nev. 770 , 783, 6 P.3d 1013, 1022 (2000), overruled on other grounds by Sharma v. State, 118 Nev. 648 , 56 P.3d 868 (2002). 2016Garner v. State, 116 Nev. 770 , 783, 6 P.3d 1013, 1022 (2000), overruled on other grounds by Sharma v. State, 118 Nev. 648 , 56 P.3d 868 (2002). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Nelson v. State
green
2 sentences2014Nelson, 123 Nev. at 543 , 170 P.3d at 524 . 2014Nelson, 123 Nev. at 543 , 170 P.3d at 524 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.