family offense violation in New York

2024The application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]).

2024The application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]).

2024The application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]).

2024The application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]).

2023Even afforded a liberal construction and accepted as true, the allegations in the family offense petition fail to allege facts that, if proven, would establish that respondent had committed a qualifying family offense, including the family offenses of harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.26(3) and stalking in the fourth degree under Penal Law § 120.45 ( see Matter of Yajaira B. v Victoria B. , 204 AD3d 600 [1st Dept 2022]).

2023Even afforded a liberal construction and accepted as true, the allegations in the family offense petition fail to allege facts that, if proven, would establish that respondent had committed a qualifying family offense, including the family offenses of harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.26(3) and stalking in the fourth degree under Penal Law § 120.45 ( see Matter of Yajaira B. v Victoria B. , 204 AD3d 600 [1st Dept 2022]).

2021In order to modify an existing court-ordered custody or parental access arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child ( see id. at 846 ; Whitehead v Whitehead , 122 AD3d 921, 921 ; Matter of Kortlang v Kortlang , 92 AD3d 785, 785 ).

2021In order to modify an existing court-ordered custody or parental access arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child ( see id. at 846 ; Whitehead v Whitehead , 122 AD3d 921, 921 ; Matter of Kortlang v Kortlang , 92 AD3d 785, 785 ).

2021In order to modify an existing court-ordered custody or parental access arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child ( see id. at 846 ; Whitehead v Whitehead , 122 AD3d 921, 921 ; Matter of Kortlang v Kortlang , 92 AD3d 785, 785 ).

2010Family Court’s dismissal of the father’s family offense and violation petitions was not addressed in the father’s brief, and any issues with respect thereto are deemed abandoned (see Matter of Silano v Oxford, 10 AD3d 466 , 467 n [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 603 [2004]; Rothberg v Reichelt, 5 AD3d 848 , 849 n [2004]).

2010Family Court’s dismissal of the father’s family offense and violation petitions was not addressed in the father’s brief, and any issues with respect thereto are deemed abandoned (see Matter of Silano v Oxford, 10 AD3d 466 , 467 n [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 603 [2004]; Rothberg v Reichelt, 5 AD3d 848 , 849 n [2004]).

2010Family Court’s dismissal of the father’s family offense and violation petitions was not addressed in the father’s brief, and any issues with respect thereto are deemed abandoned (see Matter of Silano v Oxford, 10 AD3d 466 , 467 n [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 603 [2004]; Rothberg v Reichelt, 5 AD3d 848 , 849 n [2004]).