infant plaintiffs claim (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

infant plaintiffs claim in New York

6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Corvera v. Nassau County Health Care Corp.green
nyappdiv · 2007 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Moreover, the medical records indicate that respondent’s employees were aware that the child had PVL on March 13, 2008, three months and six days after the 90-day limitation had expired, when they performed neurological testing, and it is undisputed that respondent’s employees treated him for that condition approximately three years after his birth (see Matter of Corvera v Nassau County Health Care Corp., 38 AD3d 775, 776 [2d Dept 2007]).

11
Sawyer v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.green
ny · 1986 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Co., 67 NY2d 328, 334 [1986]; Dulin v Maher, 200 AD2d 707 [1994]).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Dulin v. Maher green
nyappdiv · 1994
1 sentence

2009Co., 67 NY2d 328, 334 [1986]; Dulin v Maher, 200 AD2d 707 [1994]).

12009–2009
Coleman v. New York State Department of Social Services green
nyappdiv · 1993
1 sentence

2005Corp., 196 AD2d 818 [1993]). “[T]he obvious prejudice that has been suffered by the appellant as a result of the [10]-year delay cannot be dismissed with a mere wave of the hand and the comment that the appellant has medical records in its possession” (Matter of Matarrese v New York City Health & Hosps.

12005–2005
Meyer v. Fanelli green
nyappdiv · 1999
1 sentence

2000Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly found that the release does not bar the first cause of action asserted on behalf of the infant plaintiff (see, Meyer v Fanelli, supra; B.B.& S. Treated Lbr.

12000–2000
Morgan v. New York City Housing Authority green
nyappdiv · 1992
1 sentence

1996Auth., 181 AD2d 890 ).

11996–1996
Noseworthy v. City of New York green
ny · 1948
1 sentence

1994Moreover, in view of the absence of expert testimony to support the claim of amnesia, the court did not err in refusing to charge the jury pursuant to Nose-worthy v City of New York ( 298 NY 76 ), that the plaintiffs had a lesser burden of persuasion (see, Sawyer v Dreis & Krump Mfg.

11994–1994
Nassau-Suffolk Exterminating Co. v. Antonelli green
nyappdiv · 1989
1 sentence

1994Specifically, the plaintiffs failed to show that they could produce medical proof to support the infant plaintiffs claim that he suffered from amnesia as a result of the accident (see, Parmar v Skinner, supra).

11994–1994

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check