payments violation (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

payments violation in New York

6 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Catalano v. Catalanogreen
nyappdiv · 1990 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

23
Skiff-Murray v. Murraygreen
nyappdiv · 2005 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

23

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Catalano v. Catalano neutral
nyappdiv · 1991
2 sentences

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

2012As Colonial correctly contends, transfers made in violation of a court order are void insofar as property is transferred to an entity that has notice of the order, with no or inadequate consideration, and the court may direct that the recipients of such transfers convey the property pursuant to the escrow order (see Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 AD3d 807, 808-809 [2005]; Catalano v Catalano, 158 AD2d 570, 572 [1990], order amended 176 AD2d 278 [1991]).

32012–2012
Alard v. Weiss green
nyappdiv · 2003
1 sentence

2009In opposition to plaintiffs showing that defendants executed the promissory note and defaulted in payment (see Alard, L.L.C. v Weiss, 1 AD3d 131 [2003]), defendants’ evidence was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact concerning any of the payments they claim should be credited against the note.

12009–2009
Richards v. Richards neutral
nyappdiv · 1982
1 sentence

1983The most notable, perhaps, and one which defendant certainly could not quarrel with, is that the spouse who makes the payments can claim the total amount as alimony for tax purposes (see Richards v Richards, 86 AD2d 771 ).

11983–1983
MacMurray v. City of Long Beach neutral
ny · 1944
1 sentence

1952(MacMurray v. City of Long Beach, 292 N. Y. 286, 291 .) “ Independent of any statute, form of action or legal nomenclature, the obligation to do justice rests upon all persons, natural or artificial, and the law will compel restitution from a person who obtains money or property from another fraudulently, unjustly, or without authority.” (Pink v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 274 N. Y. 167, 173 .) The rejected claim of Albert Hutton is allowed in the amount of $200.

11952–1952
Pink v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. green
ny · 1937
1 sentence

1952(MacMurray v. City of Long Beach, 292 N. Y. 286, 291 .) “ Independent of any statute, form of action or legal nomenclature, the obligation to do justice rests upon all persons, natural or artificial, and the law will compel restitution from a person who obtains money or property from another fraudulently, unjustly, or without authority.” (Pink v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 274 N. Y. 167, 173 .) The rejected claim of Albert Hutton is allowed in the amount of $200.

11952–1952

Where else courts name it

NY 6 (1952–2012) OR 3 (1918–1965) ME 2 (2017–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check