6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The People v. Joseph Conceicao / The People v. Federico Perez / The People v. Javier Sanchezgreen2 sentences2025Defendant's challenges to the validity of his plea, including his claim that County Court (Williams Jr., J.) should have made an inquiry into a potential psychiatric defense, are unpreserved for our review absent an appropriate postallocution motion ( see People v Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]; People v Lopez , 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). 2025Defendant's challenges to the validity of his plea, including his claim that County Court (Williams Jr., J.) should have made an inquiry into a potential psychiatric defense, are unpreserved for our review absent an appropriate postallocution motion ( see People v Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]; People v Lopez , 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lopezgreen2 sentences2025Defendant's challenges to the validity of his plea, including his claim that County Court (Williams Jr., J.) should have made an inquiry into a potential psychiatric defense, are unpreserved for our review absent an appropriate postallocution motion ( see People v Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]; People v Lopez , 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). 2025Defendant's challenges to the validity of his plea, including his claim that County Court (Williams Jr., J.) should have made an inquiry into a potential psychiatric defense, are unpreserved for our review absent an appropriate postallocution motion ( see People v Conceicao , 26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]; People v Lopez , 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Tyrellgreen1 sentence2020We find that defendant's remaining challenges to the plea are unavailing ( see People v Tyrell , 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Mox
green
2 sentences2020As an alternative holding, we find that, unlike People v Mox ( 20 NY3d 936 [2012]), there was nothing in the plea allocution that triggered a duty to inquire into a potential psychiatric defense. 2020Unlike the facts in People v Mox ( 20 NY3d 936 [2012]), there was nothing in defendant's plea allocution itself that required the court to inquire about a potential psychiatric defense ( see People v Robinson , 179 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2020]). | 4 | 2015–2020 |
People v. Sidbury
green
2 sentences2025Defendant relies primarily on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Sidbury ( 42 NY3d 497 [2024]), which he asserts precludes any consideration whatsoever by a court determining a County Law former § 722-c application of the merits of a potential psychiatric defense. 2025Defendant relies primarily on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Sidbury ( 42 NY3d 497 [2024]), which he asserts precludes any consideration whatsoever by a court determining a County Law former § 722-c application of the merits of a potential psychiatric defense. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Robinson
green
1 sentence2020Unlike the facts in People v Mox ( 20 NY3d 936 [2012]), there was nothing in defendant's plea allocution itself that required the court to inquire about a potential psychiatric defense ( see People v Robinson , 179 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2020]). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence2020Nor was the court's duty to inquire triggered by statements made during the preceding 18 months of plea negotiations with prior counsel ( see People v Rodriguez , 144 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1188 [2017]). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Rivera
neutral
1 sentence2020Nor was the court's duty to inquire triggered by statements made during the preceding 18 months of plea negotiations with prior counsel ( see People v Rodriguez , 144 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1188 [2017]). | 1 | 2020–2020 |