pretrial Rosario violation in New York

6 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
People v. Banchgreen ny · 1992 · cited in 5 New York opinions naming this issue, 1993–2019 2 sentences 1998As the People correctly concede, “without any inquiry into prejudice, the defendant is entitled to a new hearing as a remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation” (People v Johnson, 191 AD2d 709, 711 , opn after remand 207 AD2d 806 ; see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610 ; People v Shim, 218 AD2d 757 ). 1996The remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation is a new suppression hearing (see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610, 617-619 ).	1	5

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
People v. Rosario green ny · 1961 2 sentences 2019The remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation ( see People v Rosario , 9 NY2d 286 ) is not automatic reversal of the conviction but a new hearing. 1992I disagree with the Court’s application of the per se reversal and new suppression hearing remedy for the pretrial Rosario violation (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , rearg denied 9 NY2d 908 , cert denied 368 US 866 ).	2	1992–2019
People v. Zollinger green nyappdiv · 1999 1 sentence 2019Retrial is necessary only if, after that hearing, the motion court concludes that the defendant should prevail ( see People v Banch , 80 NY2d 610, 619 ; People v Pugh , 258 AD2d 674 , 674).	1	2019–2019
People v. Johnson green nyappdiv · 1993 1 sentence 1998As the People correctly concede, “without any inquiry into prejudice, the defendant is entitled to a new hearing as a remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation” (People v Johnson, 191 AD2d 709, 711 , opn after remand 207 AD2d 806 ; see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610 ; People v Shim, 218 AD2d 757 ).	1	1998–1998
People v. Johnson green nyappdiv · 1994 1 sentence 1998As the People correctly concede, “without any inquiry into prejudice, the defendant is entitled to a new hearing as a remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation” (People v Johnson, 191 AD2d 709, 711 , opn after remand 207 AD2d 806 ; see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610 ; People v Shim, 218 AD2d 757 ).	1	1998–1998
People v. Torres green nyappdiv · 1995 1 sentence 1998As the People correctly concede, “without any inquiry into prejudice, the defendant is entitled to a new hearing as a remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation” (People v Johnson, 191 AD2d 709, 711 , opn after remand 207 AD2d 806 ; see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610 ; People v Shim, 218 AD2d 757 ).	1	1998–1998
People v. Graves green ny · 1995 1 sentence 1996Because defendant did not seek that relief, any claim arising from the possible violation of his Rosario rights must be deemed abandoned (see generally, People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024, 1027 ; People v Thomas, 226 AD2d 1071 [decided herewith]; People v Tamayo, 222 AD2d 321 ).	1	1996–1996
People v. Tamayo green nyappdiv · 1995 1 sentence 1996Because defendant did not seek that relief, any claim arising from the possible violation of his Rosario rights must be deemed abandoned (see generally, People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024, 1027 ; People v Thomas, 226 AD2d 1071 [decided herewith]; People v Tamayo, 222 AD2d 321 ).	1	1996–1996
People v. Thomas green nyappdiv · 1996 1 sentence 1996Because defendant did not seek that relief, any claim arising from the possible violation of his Rosario rights must be deemed abandoned (see generally, People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024, 1027 ; People v Thomas, 226 AD2d 1071 [decided herewith]; People v Tamayo, 222 AD2d 321 ).	1	1996–1996
Geddes Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ferrante green nyappdiv · 1996 2 sentences 1996In addition, the remedy for a pretrial Rosario violation is a new suppression hearing (see, People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610, 618 ; People v Gierszewski, 226 AD2d 1099 ). 1996Because defendant did not seek that relief, any claim arising from the possible violation of his Rosario rights must be deemed abandoned (see, People v Gierszewski, supra).	1	1996–1996
People v. Jackson green ny · 1991 1 sentence 1992This is not simply a refusal to create "another exception” to the per se remedy, but rather represents a new variety of expansion of that extreme remedy into the pretrial phase of the criminal adjudication process (contrast, People v Jackson, 78 NY2d 638 ; People v Bin Wahad, 79 NY2d 787 ).	1	1992–1992
Cummings v. Bennett green scotus · 1961 1 sentence 1992I disagree with the Court’s application of the per se reversal and new suppression hearing remedy for the pretrial Rosario violation (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , rearg denied 9 NY2d 908 , cert denied 368 US 866 ).	1	1992–1992
People v. Wahad green ny · 1991 1 sentence 1992This is not simply a refusal to create "another exception” to the per se remedy, but rather represents a new variety of expansion of that extreme remedy into the pretrial phase of the criminal adjudication process (contrast, People v Jackson, 78 NY2d 638 ; People v Bin Wahad, 79 NY2d 787 ).	1	1992–1992

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check