6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cramer v. Auglaize Acresgreen2 sentences2011Civ.R. 56. {¶ 22} The three-tier analysis that governs the application of sovereign immunity to a political subdivision pursuant to Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, is set forth in Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 113 Ohio St.3d 266 , 2007-Ohio-1946 , 865 N.E.2d 9, ¶14-16 , quoting Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , 790 N.E.2d 781 , ¶7-9: {¶ 23} “Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from tort liability pursuant to R.C. 2011Civ.R. 56. {¶ 22} The three-tier analysis that governs the application of sovereign immunity to a political subdivision pursuant to Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, is set forth in Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 113 Ohio St.3d 266 , 2007-Ohio-1946 , 865 N.E.2d 9, ¶14-16 , quoting Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , 790 N.E.2d 781 , ¶7-9: {¶ 23} “Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from tort liability pursuant to R.C. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Colbert v. City of Cleveland
green
2 sentences2011Civ.R. 56. {¶ 22} The three-tier analysis that governs the application of sovereign immunity to a political subdivision pursuant to Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, is set forth in Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 113 Ohio St.3d 266 , 2007-Ohio-1946 , 865 N.E.2d 9, ¶14-16 , quoting Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , 790 N.E.2d 781 , ¶7-9: {¶ 23} “Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from tort liability pursuant to R.C. 2011Civ.R. 56. {¶ 22} The three-tier analysis that governs the application of sovereign immunity to a political subdivision pursuant to Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, is set forth in Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 113 Ohio St.3d 266 , 2007-Ohio-1946 , 865 N.E.2d 9, ¶14-16 , quoting Colbert v. Cleveland, 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , 790 N.E.2d 781 , ¶7-9: {¶ 23} “Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from tort liability pursuant to R.C. | 4 | 2008–2014 |
Goad v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners
green
1 sentence2008Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 521 , 523-524 . {¶ 14} The three-tier analysis that governs the application of sovereign immunity to a political subdivision pursuant to Chapter 2744 of the Ohio Revised Code, is set forth in Cramer v. Auglaize Acres , 113 Ohio St.3d 266 , 2007-Ohio-1946 , ¶ 14-16 , quoting Colbert v. Cleveland , 99 Ohio St.3d 215 , 2003-Ohio-3319 , ¶ 7-9 : {¶ 15} "Determining whether a political subdivision is immune from tort liability pursuant to R.C. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.
green
1 sentence2007Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co . (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 102 , 105 , i.e., we review the trial court's judgment independently and without deference to its determination. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.