6 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Staten v. Steelgreen2 sentences2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d 2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d | 3 | 5 |
Graham v. Howtongreen2 sentences2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d 2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d | 2 | 4 |
Yes on 24-367 Committee v. Deatongreen2 sentences2021See Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 27-32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (describing the legislative background on ORS 31.150 and concluding that the “purpose of the special motion to strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expe- ditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten consti- tutional free speech rights, not to deprive litigants of the benefit of a jury determination that a claim is meritorious.” (emphasis omitted)); see also Yes On 24-367 Committee v. Deaton, 276 Or App 347, 350-51 , 367 P3d 937 (2016) (explain- ing that, under 2021See Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 27-32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (describing the legislative background on ORS 31.150 and concluding that the “purpose of the special motion to strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expe- ditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten consti- tutional free speech rights, not to deprive litigants of the benefit of a jury determination that a claim is meritorious.” (emphasis omitted)); see also Yes On 24-367 Committee v. Deaton, 276 Or App 347, 350-51 , 367 P3d 937 (2016) (explain- ing that, under | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeHart v. Tofte
green
2 sentences2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d 2023The anti-SLAPP statute allows defendants, before incurring significant expenses, “to expeditiously move to dismiss nonmeritorious claims that were filed in a strate- gic effort to chill participation in public affairs.” Id.; Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to Cite as 326 Or App 720 (2023) 725 strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive lit- igants of the benefit of a jury d | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Clackamas River Water v. Holloway
neutral
2 sentences2021See Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 27-32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (describing the legislative background on ORS 31.150 and concluding that the “purpose of the special motion to strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expe- ditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten consti- tutional free speech rights, not to deprive litigants of the benefit of a jury determination that a claim is meritorious.” (emphasis omitted)); see also Yes On 24-367 Committee v. Deaton, 276 Or App 347, 350-51 , 367 P3d 937 (2016) (explain- ing that, under 2021See Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 27-32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (describing the legislative background on ORS 31.150 and concluding that the “purpose of the special motion to strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expe- ditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten consti- tutional free speech rights, not to deprive litigants of the benefit of a jury determination that a claim is meritorious.” (emphasis omitted)); see also Yes On 24-367 Committee v. Deaton, 276 Or App 347, 350-51 , 367 P3d 937 (2016) (explain- ing that, under | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Young v. Davis
green
1 sentence2014Young, 259 Or App at 508 ; see also Staten v. Steel, 222 Or App 17, 32 , 191 P3d 778 (2008), rev den, 345 Or 618 (2009) (“The purpose of the special motion to strike procedure, as amplified in the pertinent legislative history, is to expeditiously terminate unfounded claims that threaten constitutional free speech rights, not to deprive litigants of the benefit of a jury determination that a claim is meritorious.” (Emphases in original.)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Wedge
green
1 sentence2006Because the State did not plead any departure factors in the Indictment, the Court lacks jurisdiction to impose any sentence other than the presumptive sentence for any of the defendant’s felony convictions. [See] also State v. Wedge, 293 Or 598 .” *253 To be sure, defendant cited Apprendi and argued that aggravating factors must be “proven to the fact finder beyond a reasonable doubt.” However, when viewed in context, it is clear that defendant’s argument regarding Apprendi was directed solely at the fact that the aggravating factors had not been pleaded in the indictment — a different issue | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.