6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1934–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2016See Commonwealth v. Jones, 826 A.2d 900, 907 (Pa. Super. 2003) (“An abuse of discretion is not merely an error of judgment, but if in -8- J-A10016-16 reaching a conclusion the law is overridden or misapplied or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill will, as shown by the evidence or the record, discretion is abused.”) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Terwilliger
green
2 sentences1994Id. at 568, 450 A.2d at 1384 . 1994Id. at 568, 450 A.2d at 1384 . | 4 | 1994–1994 |
Zukowsky v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Co., 270 Pa. 132 , 113 A. 62 ) is, that returning home from employment is not considered as furthering the master’s business unless there is a special contract covering such incidents. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Strohl v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Co., 270 Pa. 132 , 113 A. 62 ) is, that returning home from employment is not considered as furthering the master’s business unless there is a special contract covering such incidents. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Morucci v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.
green
2 sentences1934The question involved in this appeal is fully discussed and early cases distinguished and classified by Mr. Justice Kephart in Morucci v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 297 Pa. 508 , 147 A. 533 , in which we find the following (p. 512): “The clear legal principle to be deduced from the case just discussed (Strohl v. Eastern Pa. Rys. 1934The question involved in this appeal is fully discussed and early cases distinguished and classified by Mr. Justice Kephart in Morucci v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 297 Pa. 508 , 147 A. 533 , in which we find the following (p. 512): “The clear legal principle to be deduced from the case just discussed (Strohl v. Eastern Pa. Rys. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.