6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Harrisburg Knights of Columbus Home Ass'ngreen1 sentence2012Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Harrisburg Knights of Columbus Home Association, 989 A.2d 39, 46 (Pa.Cmwlth.2009). 12 While Section 494 also sets forth the penalties a court is required to impose for a criminal conviction for a violation of the Liquor Code, 13 which includes a criminal conviction for violating Section 493(1), Section 494 further provides that “[t]he right to suspend and revoke licenses granted under this article shall be in addition to the penalty set forth in this section.” 47 P.S. § 4-494(b). | 1 | 1 |
Desanctis v. Pritchardgreen2 sentences2009See 3 P.S. § 459-601(a); see also Desanctis v. Pritchard, 803 A.2d 230, 232 (Pa.Super.2002). 2009See 3 P.S. § 459-601(a); see also Desanctis v. Pritchard, 803 A.2d 230, 232 (Pa.Super.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Rankingreen2 sentences1974Moreover, “ ‘In view of the jury’s verdict, the evidence must be read in a light most favorable to the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth is entitled to every reasonable inference arising from that evidence. [Citations omitted.]’” Commonwealth v. Rankin, 441 Pa. 401, 404 , 272 A.2d 886, 887 (1971). 1974Moreover, “ ‘In view of the jury’s verdict, the evidence must be read in a light most favorable to the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth is entitled to every reasonable inference arising from that evidence. [Citations omitted.]’” Commonwealth v. Rankin, 441 Pa. 401, 404 , 272 A.2d 886, 887 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Oatesgreen2 sentences1974On appeal from a criminal conviction the test for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence is “ ‘whether, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, upon which if believed the jury *238 could properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime ... of which he has been convicted.’ ” Commonwealth v. Oates, 448 Pa. 486, 489 , 295 A.2d 337, 338 (1972); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). 1974On appeal from a criminal conviction the test for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence is “ ‘whether, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, upon which if believed the jury *238 could properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime ... of which he has been convicted.’ ” Commonwealth v. Oates, 448 Pa. 486, 489 , 295 A.2d 337, 338 (1972); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alleyne v. United States
green
1 sentence2025The Court’s decision in Ice, however, did not address the prior criminal conviction exception to Apprendi’s general rule. 9 The Alleyne Court acknowledged that, in Almendarez-Torres, it recognized a “narrow exception to this general rule for the fact of a prior conviction.” Alleyne, 570 U.S. at 111 n.1. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Adames v. Sheahan
green
1 sentence2025Adames, 909 N.E.2d at 762 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Commonwealth v. Wrona
green
2 sentences1975Commonwealth v. Lowe, 460 Pa. 357 , 333 A.2d 765 (1975); Com *662 monwealth v. Wrona, 442 Pa. 201 , 275 A.2d 78 (1971). 1975Commonwealth v. Lowe, 460 Pa. 357 , 333 A.2d 765 (1975); Com *662 monwealth v. Wrona, 442 Pa. 201 , 275 A.2d 78 (1971). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Commonwealth v. Lowe
green
2 sentences1975Commonwealth v. Lowe, 460 Pa. 357 , 333 A.2d 765 (1975); Com *662 monwealth v. Wrona, 442 Pa. 201 , 275 A.2d 78 (1971). 1975Commonwealth v. Lowe, 460 Pa. 357 , 333 A.2d 765 (1975); Com *662 monwealth v. Wrona, 442 Pa. 201 , 275 A.2d 78 (1971). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Commonwealth v. Agie
green
2 sentences1974On appeal from a criminal conviction the test for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence is “ ‘whether, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, upon which if believed the jury *238 could properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime ... of which he has been convicted.’ ” Commonwealth v. Oates, 448 Pa. 486, 489 , 295 A.2d 337, 338 (1972); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). 1974On appeal from a criminal conviction the test for evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence is “ ‘whether, accepting as true all the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, upon which if believed the jury *238 could properly have based its verdict, it is sufficient in law to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime ... of which he has been convicted.’ ” Commonwealth v. Oates, 448 Pa. 486, 489 , 295 A.2d 337, 338 (1972); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.