facts developed hearing (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

facts developed hearing in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Public Opinion v. Chambersburg Area School Districtgreen
pacommwct · 1995 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See id. (citing Public Opinion v. Chambersburg Area School District, 654 A.2d 284, 286-87 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1995)).

2004See id. (citing Public Opinion v. Chambersburg Area School District, 654 A.2d 284, 286-87 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995)).

22
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen
scotus · 1938 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967
2 sentences

1967In our view, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the facts developed at the hearing will not support a finding that appellant’s failure to prosecute an appeal is the result of an “intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S. Ct. 1019, 1023 (1938); see Commonwealth ex rel.

1967In our view, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the facts developed at the hearing will not support a finding that appellant’s failure to prosecute an appeal is the result of an “intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.” Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S. Ct. 1019, 1023 (1938); see Commonwealth ex rel.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1) green
pasuperct · 1949
2 sentences

1967It was said in Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1), 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 119 , 67 A. 2d 757 : “It must be emphasized that when a borough annexes land it exercises, a delegated sovereign power.

1967It was said in Irwin Borough Annexation Case (No. 1), 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 119 , 67 A. 2d 757 : “It must be emphasized that when a borough annexes land it exercises, a delegated sovereign power.

11967–1967
Lehigh Navigation Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission green
pasuperct · 1938
2 sentences

1959The instant proceedings may, as the court below found, be governed by Lehigh Navigation Coal Co. v. P. U. C., supra ( 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 1 A. 2d 540 ), because the facts developed at hearing may show it to involve fares and the servicing of a railroad facility and hence should be decided ultimately by the Commission.

1959The instant proceedings may, as the court below found, be governed by Lehigh Navigation Coal Co. v. P. U. C., supra ( 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 1 A. 2d 540 ), because the facts developed at hearing may show it to involve fares and the servicing of a railroad facility and hence should be decided ultimately by the Commission.

11959–1959
Seila's Liquor License Case green
· 1936
2 sentences

1937“Where a petition filed under the Liquor Control Act ......does not pray for forefeiture of the bond, but merely for revocation of the license, may the court, nevertheless, order the bond forfeited?” As to the first question, an examination of the record in the case now at bar discloses there is not sufficient difference in the facts developed at the hearing in the court below to distinguish it from Seila’s Liquor License Case, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 519 , 190 A. 203 .

1937“Where a petition filed under the Liquor Control Act ......does not pray for forefeiture of the bond, but merely for revocation of the license, may the court, nevertheless, order the bond forfeited?” As to the first question, an examination of the record in the case now at bar discloses there is not sufficient difference in the facts developed at the hearing in the court below to distinguish it from Seila’s Liquor License Case, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 519 , 190 A. 203 .

11937–1937

Where else courts name it

PA 6 (1937–2004) NY 5 (1954–2017) MO 4 (1965–1982) GA 3 (2008–2022) NJ 3 (1955–1990) HI 2 (1935–1940) NC 2 (1937–1937) CA 2 (1928–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check