6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reitz v. Mealeygreen2 sentences2024See generally Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33 , 36 . . . (1941) (recognizing that states are permitted to enforce licensing regulations aimed at promoting public safety), overruled on other grounds by Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637 , 651-52 . . . (1971). [(Footnote omitted.)] Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Middaugh, 244 A.3d 426 , 437-38 (Pa. 2021). 2021See [J-7-2020] - 19 generally Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33, 36 , 62 S. Ct. 24, 26-27 (1941) (recognizing that states are permitted to enforce licensing regulations aimed at promoting public safety), overruled on other grounds by Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 651-52 , 91 S. Ct. 1704, 1712 (1971).14 IV. | 2 | 2 |
Perez. v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2024See generally Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33 , 36 . . . (1941) (recognizing that states are permitted to enforce licensing regulations aimed at promoting public safety), overruled on other grounds by Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637 , 651-52 . . . (1971). [(Footnote omitted.)] Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Middaugh, 244 A.3d 426 , 437-38 (Pa. 2021). 2021See [J-7-2020] - 19 generally Reitz v. Mealey, 314 U.S. 33, 36 , 62 S. Ct. 24, 26-27 (1941) (recognizing that states are permitted to enforce licensing regulations aimed at promoting public safety), overruled on other grounds by Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 651-52 , 91 S. Ct. 1704, 1712 (1971).14 IV. | 2 | 2 |
Pessolano v. Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen2 sentences2006See generally Pessolano, 632 A.2d at 1093 n. 3. . 2006See generally Pessolano, 632 A.2d at 1093 n. 3. [8] We also defer to the Zoning Board's apparent understanding that the term "owner," as used in Section 914.07.G.2(a)(4), may include an entity that owns a leasehold interest giving it control over the required number of parking spaces. | 2 | 2 |
Vito v. Zoning Hearing Boardgreen1 sentence2022See Richman, 137 A.2d at 284 ; Vito v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Whitehall, 458 A.2d 620, 621 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen1 sentence2022See Richman, 137 A.2d at 284 ; Vito v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Whitehall, 458 A.2d 620, 621 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Erie Golf Coursegreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., In re Erie Golf Course, 605 Pa. 484, 502 , 992 A.2d 75, 85 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Fleminggreen1 sentence2011See, e.g., In re Erie Golf Course, 605 Pa. 484, 502 , 992 A.2d 75, 85 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.