6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vaccone v. Sykengreen2 sentences2007AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2007, this Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby treated as a Petition for Review, see Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380 , 899 A.2d 1103 , 1106 n. 2 (2006), as this matter involves a challenge to the order of the Superior Court quashing Petitioner’s appeal. 2007AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2007, this Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby treated as a Petition for Review, see Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380 , 899 A.2d 1103 , 1106 n. 2 (2006), as this matter involves a challenge to the order of the Superior Court quashing Petitioner’s appeal. | 4 | 5 |
In Re Francis Edward McGillick Foundationgreen1 sentence2020In re Francis Edward McGillick Foundation, 642 A.2d 467, 469 (Pa. 1994) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). -5- J-A30043-19 On appeal, this Court stated: At its heart, the complaint in this matter involves a claim that Appellees failed in their duty to draft a Will for Wife that effectuated her testamentary intent. . . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.