penalty imposed violation (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

penalty imposed violation in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Township of Penn v. Seymourgreen
pacommwct · 1998 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2021
2 sentences

2021Id. at 865 .

2020Township of Penn v. Seymour, 708 A.2d 861, 864-65 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (emphasis added).

24

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp. green
pa · 1965
1 sentence

1998Id.

11998–1998
Commonwealth v. Sellers green
pa · 1889
1 sentence

1901The title of the act gives notice of an express prohibition of the use of billiard tables, and notice of such prohibition is a sufficient warning of the penalty imposed for the violation: Commonwealth v. Sellers, 130 Pa. 32 .

11901–1901

Where else courts name it

NY 10 (1904–2022) PA 6 (1901–2021) FL 3 (1890–1989) CA 3 (1958–1986) IL 3 (1910–1923) NC 2 (1905–2004) GA 2 (2013–2013) UT 2 (1991–1994) OH 2 (2013–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check