permanent injunction hearing (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

permanent injunction hearing in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1994–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Stacey v. City of Hermitage Board of Appealsgreen
pacommwct · 2001 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023See id. at 774 .

2023See id.

11
Commonwealth v. McNeilgreen
pa · 2018 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See id.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Wolk, A. v. Lower Merion SD, Aplt. green
pa · 2018
2 sentences

2024As the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has explained: 7 In Wolk v. School District of Lower Merion, 197 A.3d 730 (Pa. 2018), our Supreme Court opined: We are not, at this juncture, prepared to say that a court may never [convert a preliminary injunction hearing into a permanent injunction hearing] in the absence of a stipulation, given that there may be scenarios in which a proponent of an injunction would fail to proffer any additional material evidence to be considered by the court, upon an appropriate request for such a proffer.

2020Wolk, 197 A.3d at 741-42 .

22020–2024
Buffalo Township v. Jones green
pa · 2002
2 sentences

2022Appellant also argues that the court’s decision to award the dogs to Appellee after the permanent injunction hearing is not supported by the evidence.6 Id.

2022Appellant avers, without citation to the record, that he “presented clear evidence of ownership for both dogs: titles, payment receipts, veterinary records, and dog licenses, all of which are in Appellant’s name.” Id.

12022–2022
Smith v. Keim green
pacommwct · 1973
2 sentences

1994When the Charter and regulations have the force and effect of law, “civil service laws cannot be obviated by agreement.” Smith v. Keim, 8 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 610, 303 A.2d 869 (1973). 2 Since the 91 List expired by operation of law on June 19, 1993, it cannot be extended by agreement or by the order of a court. 3 Appellants also contend that the trial court erred by refusing to allow them discovery and the opportunity to present testimony at the hearing on the permanent injunction, and thereby impermissibly “merged” the preliminary injunction hearing with the permanent injunction hearing.

1994When the Charter and regulations have the force and effect of law, "civil service laws cannot be obviated by agreement." Smith v. Keim, 8 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 610, 303 A.2d 869 (1973). [2] Since the 91 List expired by operation of law on *182 June 19, 1993, it cannot be extended by agreement or by the order of a court. [3] Appellants also contend that the trial court erred by refusing to allow them discovery and the opportunity to present testimony at the hearing on the permanent injunction, and thereby impermissibly "merged" the preliminary injunction hearing with the permanent injunction hear

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

LA 13 (1980–2024) PA 6 (1994–2024) WA 5 (2007–2015) TX 5 (2015–2025) FL 4 (1971–2024) AL 4 (1963–2025) OH 4 (2019–2026) CA 4 (2016–2023) NC 3 (1983–2003) CO 2 (2010–2025) GA 2 (1982–2009) NY 2 (2025–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check