6 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor (Depco)green1 sentence2002See also, In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor (DEPCO), 593 A.2d at 946 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement System
green
2 sentences2005Employees' Retirement System, 173 F.3d 46 , 59 (1 st Cir. 1999). 2005Employees' Retirement System, 173 F.3d 46 , 59 (1 st Cir. 1999). | 3 | 2005–2005 |
Finch v. Rhode Island Grocers Association
green
2 sentences2005Finch v. Rhode Island Grocers Assn., 93 R.I. 323 , 330 , 175 A.2d 177 , 181 (1961). 2005Finch v. Rhode Island Grocers Assn., 93 R.I. 323 , 330 , 175 A.2d 177 , 181 (1961). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
green
2 sentences2002Moreover, the DEPCO Act has consistently been held not to violate the contracts clause of both the Rhode Island and United States Constitution. 21 In Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co., 459 U.S. 400 , 103 S.Ct. 697 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983), the United States Supreme Court announced a three-part test to determine whether legislation unconstitutionally impairs the obligation of contracts. 2002Moreover, the DEPCO Act has consistently been held not to violate the contracts clause of both the Rhode Island and United States Constitution. 21 In Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co., 459 U.S. 400 , 103 S.Ct. 697 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983), the United States Supreme Court announced a three-part test to determine whether legislation unconstitutionally impairs the obligation of contracts. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Brown
green
1 sentence1996Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Brown, supra. Although this particular section has not been the subject of constitutional scrutiny by our Supreme Court, this Court is satisfied that this section is reasonably necessary for the entire DEPCO Act to serve its constitutionally justified legitimate public purpose of returning funds to deposit creditors and eventually to the Rhode Island economy. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.