6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
National Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. Jamestown Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences1997Co., 70 Misc.2d 701 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1001 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1972)(“A fire insurance contract endorsed with the standard mortgagee clause creates an independent contract for the insurance of the mortgagee’s interest.”); Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Charles S. Martin Distrib. 1997Co., 70 Misc.2d 701 , 334 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1001 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1972)(“A fire insurance contract endorsed with the standard mortgagee clause creates an independent contract for the insurance of the mortgagee’s interest.”); Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Charles S. Martin Distrib. | 1 | 1 |
AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. Charles S. Martin Distributing Company, Inc.green2 sentences1997Co., 120 Ga.App. 133 , 169 S.E.2d 695, 696 (1969)(Under a New York standard mortgagee clause, the fact that insured had wilfully and fraudulently burned her property in order to collect the insurance thereon, does not bar mortgagee’s claim to the proceeds of the policy.). 1997Co., 120 Ga.App. 133 , 169 S.E.2d 695, 696 (1969)(Under a New York standard mortgagee clause, the fact that insured had wilfully and fraudulently burned her property in order to collect the insurance thereon, does not bar mortgagee’s claim to the proceeds of the policy.). | 1 | 1 |
Kirton v. Howardgreen1 sentence1989Willard v. Finch, 123 S. C. 56, 116 S. E. 96 (1923); See Kirton v. Howard, 137 S. C. 11, 134 S. E. 859 (1926) {bona fide purchaser for value without notice). 4 The record does not reflect when disbursement was made but the inferences are that they occurred before November 1985. 5 Act No. 635,1988 S. C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Hunt
green
2 sentences2000Id. at 93 , 488 S.E.2d at 341 . 2000Id. at 93 , 488 S.E.2d at 341 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. . Williams
green
1 sentence1989Willard v. Finch, 123 S. C. 56, 116 S. E. 96 (1923); See Kirton v. Howard, 137 S. C. 11, 134 S. E. 859 (1926) {bona fide purchaser for value without notice). 4 The record does not reflect when disbursement was made but the inferences are that they occurred before November 1985. 5 Act No. 635,1988 S. C. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Franklin Fire Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1984Prudential v. Franklin, supra, while not addressing Walker , refined and extended our rule in these cases by recognizing that there is a condition-precedent prescribed in securing the mortgagee’s independent status, i.e., the payment of the premium when demanded by the insurer. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1965Walker v. Queen Insurance Company , 136 S.C. 144 , 134 S.E. 263 , 52 A.L.R. 259 . 1965Walker v. Queen Insurance Company , 136 S.C. 144 , 134 S.E. 263 , 52 A.L.R. 259 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Walker v. Killian
neutral
1 sentence1912The mortgage provided that on default, the mortgagee might seize and sell the property, and that upon the sale “he shall apply the proceeds of such sale, after deducting all expenses and charges, including attorney’s fees, toward the payment and discharge of the indebtedness,” etc. Under a similar oontract, it was held in Walker v. 'Killian, 62 S. C. 482, 40 S. E. 887 , that the mortgagee could not claim the fees if he foreclosed by action and not by seizure under the power. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.