countervailing factors in Tennessee

6 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

Case	Cited	Years
White v. Vanderbilt University green tennctapp · 1999 2 sentences 2019First, the trial court must “balance the probative value of the [challenged evidence] against the countervailing factors.” Id. (citing White, 21 S.W.3d at 227 ). 2019First, the trial court must “balance the probative value of the [challenged evidence] against the countervailing factors.” Id. (citing White, 21 S.W.3d at 227 ).	6	2009–2019

Where else courts name it

TX 52 (1880–2025) CA 12 (1992–2025) NY 11 (1945–2016) PA 9 (1926–2019) MD 8 (1997–2015) OR 7 (1912–2001) AL 7 (1982–2008) TN 6 (2009–2019) IL 5 (1978–2022) CT 4 (1996–2010) WA 4 (1981–1998) NJ 4 (1975–1999) GA 4 (2011–2020) NE 3 (1995–2004) AZ 3 (1983–2006) IN 3 (1882–1921) DC 3 (1989–2014) WY 3 (1987–1997) DE 2 (1986–2016) MO 2 (1965–1984) SD 2 (1992–2018) MA 2 (1979–1980) OH 2 (2005–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check