federal civil rights violation in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Kalmas v. Wagnergreen wash · 1997 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000More recently, in Kalmas v. Wagner, 133 Wash.2d 210 , 943 P.2d 1369 (1997), we considered a federal civil rights violation claim against two deputy sheriffs who entered a tenant's premises at tenant's request as part of a landlord-tenant dispute. 2000More recently, in Kalmas v. Wagner, 133 Wn.2d 210 , 943 P.2d 1369 (1997), we considered a federal civil rights violation claim against two deputy sheriffs who entered a tenant’s premises at tenant’s request as part of a landlord-tenant dispute.	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Samuels v. City of Lake Stevens neutral washctapp · 1988 2 sentences 2005Samuels, 50 Wn. 2005Samuels, 50 Wash.App. at 478-81 , 749 P.2d 187 .	2	2005–2005
Shoemaker v. City of Bremerton green wash · 1987 2 sentences 2004The court said, “[t]he fact that the issue determined is also a central element in the federal civil rights claim does not mean that giving preclusive effect to that determination is an improper application of claim preclusion or that the Commission has acted beyond its competence.” Id. at 512-13 . 13 CONCLUSION Samaritan has shown that collateral estoppel is appropriately applied here to bar relitigating the issue of whether Christensen was discharged in retaliation for union activities. 2004The court said, "[t]he fact that the issue determined is also a central element in the federal civil rights claim does not mean that giving preclusive effect to that determination is an improper application of claim preclusion or that the Commission has acted beyond its competence." Id. at 512-13 , 745 P.2d 858 . [13] CONCLUSION Samaritan has shown that collateral estoppel is appropriately applied here to bar relitigating the issue of whether Christensen was discharged in retaliation for union activities.	2	2004–2004
Kalmas v. Wagner green wash · 1997 2 sentences 2000More recently, in Kalmas v. Wagner, 133 Wash.2d 210 , 943 P.2d 1369 (1997), we considered a federal civil rights violation claim against two deputy sheriffs who entered a tenant's premises at tenant's request as part of a landlord-tenant dispute. 2000More recently, in Kalmas v. Wagner, 133 Wn.2d 210 , 943 P.2d 1369 (1997), we considered a federal civil rights violation claim against two deputy sheriffs who entered a tenant’s premises at tenant’s request as part of a landlord-tenant dispute.	2	2000–2000

Where else courts name it

CA 28 (1990–2022) NY 9 (1981–2014) WI 8 (1987–2013) FL 8 (1996–2012) IL 7 (1992–2009) WA 6 (2000–2005) AL 5 (1998–2015) ME 4 (2002–2022) NJ 4 (1982–2014) MI 3 (1997–2019) PA 3 (1997–2022) TN 3 (2001–2025) KY 3 (1992–1997) MA 3 (1981–2014) NM 3 (1997–2014) IA 3 (1983–2014) AR 2 (2014–2017) OK 2 (1989–1996) LA 2 (1991–2024) OR 2 (1988–1995) CO 2 (2000–2020) UT 2 (1990–1994) DC 2 (1996–2005) TX 2 (2012–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check