6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collinsgreen1 sentence2018See To-Ro Trade Shows, 144 Wn.2d at 411 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bishop v. Miche
green
2 sentences2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Bishop v. Miche
green
2 sentences2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). 2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Landa
green
2 sentences1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. 1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
People v. Miller
green
2 sentences1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. 1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Mozzetti v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. 1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession ( Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.Ed.2d *294 215, 83 Sup. Ct. 1194 (1963); Marshall v. United States, 355 F.2d 999 (9th Cir.1966)), and overlooks the principle that the unexplained failure to call to the stand a witness to a crime or one who has relevant knowledge of it may raise a presumption that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the state. 1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
John Marshall and Charles Del Monico v. United States
green
1 sentence1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession ( Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.Ed.2d *294 215, 83 Sup. Ct. 1194 (1963); Marshall v. United States, 355 F.2d 999 (9th Cir.1966)), and overlooks the principle that the unexplained failure to call to the stand a witness to a crime or one who has relevant knowledge of it may raise a presumption that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the state. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1938Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 247 N. Y. 271 , 160 N. E. 367 , 72 A. L. 1938Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 247 N. Y. 271 , 160 N. E. 367 , 72 A. L. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.