genuine exception (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

genuine exception in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collinsgreen
wash · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See To-Ro Trade Shows, 144 Wn.2d at 411 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Bishop v. Miche green
wash · 1999
2 sentences

2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999).

2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999).

22010–2010
Bishop v. Miche green
wash · 1999
2 sentences

2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wash.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999).

2010Bishop v. Miche, 137 Wn.2d 518, 523 , 973 P.2d 465 (1999).

22010–2010
People v. Landa green
calctapp · 1973
2 sentences

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

11973–1973
People v. Miller green
cal · 1972
2 sentences

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

11973–1973
Mozzetti v. Superior Court green
cal · 1971
2 sentences

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

1973People v. Miller, 7 Cal. 3d 219 , 496 P.2d 1228 , 101 Cal. Rptr. 860 (1972); Mozzetti v. Supe *331 rior Ct., 4 Cal. 3d 699 , 484 P.2d 84 , 94 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1971); People v. Landa, 30 Cal. App. 3d 487 , 106 Cal. Rptr. 329 (1973) , 1 Washington, however, following the majority view, recognizes the validity of a warrantless inventory search if the car is lawfully impounded.

11973–1973
Brady v. Maryland green
scotus · 1963
2 sentences

1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession ( Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.Ed.2d *294 215, 83 Sup. Ct. 1194 (1963); Marshall v. United States, 355 F.2d 999 (9th Cir.1966)), and overlooks the principle that the unexplained failure to call to the stand a witness to a crime or one who has relevant knowledge of it may raise a presumption that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the state.

1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.

11967–1967
John Marshall and Charles Del Monico v. United States green
ca9 · 1966
1 sentence

1967The majority opinion, I would say, either brushes over lightly or ignores a basic duty of the prosecuting attorney to present all material, competent and relevant evidence in his possession ( Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.Ed.2d *294 215, 83 Sup. Ct. 1194 (1963); Marshall v. United States, 355 F.2d 999 (9th Cir.1966)), and overlooks the principle that the unexplained failure to call to the stand a witness to a crime or one who has relevant knowledge of it may raise a presumption that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the state.

11967–1967
Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. green
ny · 1928
2 sentences

1938Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 247 N. Y. 271 , 160 N. E. 367 , 72 A. L.

1938Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 247 N. Y. 271 , 160 N. E. 367 , 72 A. L.

11938–1938

Where else courts name it

NY 29 (1926–2022) KS 13 (1915–1994) IL 12 (1958–2025) TX 11 (2003–2016) OH 7 (2001–2026) FL 6 (1869–1995) WA 6 (1938–2018) ME 5 (1980–2018) NC 5 (1982–2019) PA 5 (1898–2026) NJ 4 (1962–1978) NM 4 (1958–1987) WI 3 (1937–2022) OR 3 (1996–2023) MD 3 (1942–2018) DE 3 (2014–2021) CT 3 (1974–2019) MA 2 (1975–2011) IA 2 (2014–2014) ID 2 (1914–2011) GA 2 (1900–1976) MS 2 (1980–1982) LA 2 (1991–1994) SD 2 (1999–1999) HI 2 (1953–1974) AZ 2 (2016–2019) CA 2 (2021–2026) PR 2 (1954–1962)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check