6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Martorano, Raymond, A/K/A Lon Johngreen1 sentence1989The State proposed an instruction taken from United States v. Martorano, 709 F.2d 863, 869 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 993 (1983), which stated: "dominion and control [is] the ability to reduce an object to actual possession". | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Mriglot
green
1 sentence2017That instruction is the focus here, not the State's proposed instruction. 78 Id. 26 No. 72951-9-1/27 Comment on the Evidence Gill next argues that the second sentence of the instruction commented on the evidence. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Stinton
green
1 sentence2016App. 844, 851 , 326 P.3d 876 (2014). 8 State v. Stinton, 121 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Kindell
green
2 sentences2016We note that the State proposed the instruction at issue because the jury in the first trial had repeatedly asked the court whether a violation of a no-contact 7 State v. Kindell. 181 Wn. 2016App. 844, 851 , 326 P.3d 876 (2014). 8 State v. Stinton, 121 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Coristine
green
1 sentence2014Coristine, 177 Wn.2d at 374 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. DeRyke
neutral
1 sentence2008Id. ¶ 26 As in DeRyke, the verdict here is ambiguous. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. DeRyke
neutral
1 sentence2008Id. ¶26 As in DeRyke, the verdict here is ambiguous. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
County of Rockland v. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
green
1 sentence1989The State proposed an instruction taken from United States v. Martorano, 709 F.2d 863, 869 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 993 (1983), which stated: "dominion and control [is] the ability to reduce an object to actual possession". | 1 | 1989–1989 |