5 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Laing v. Lainggreen1 sentence2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 1 |
Lang v. Langgreen1 sentence2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 1 |
Davila v. Davilagreen1 sentence2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 1 |
Lundquist v. Lundquistgreen1 sentence2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Brooksgreen2 sentences2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered 2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 1 |
Barnett v. Barnettgreen1 sentence2013Barnett v. Barnett, 238 P.3d 594, 599 (Alaska 2010) (citations omitted). 13 . | 1 | 1 |
Broadribb v. Broadribbgreen1 sentence2006AS 25.24.160(a)(2) provides: (a) In a judgment in an action for divorce ... the court may provide [[Image here]] (2) for the recovery by one party from the other of an amount of money for maintenance, for a limited or indefinite period of time, in gross or in installments, as may be just and necessary without regard to which of the parties is in fault; an award of maintenance must fairly allocate the economic effect of divorce by being based on a consideration of the following factors: (A) the length of the marriage and station in life of the parties during the marriage; (B) the age and health | 1 | 1 |
Fitzgerald v. Puddicombegreen1 sentence1999See Fitzgerald v. Puddicombe, 918 P.2d 1017, 1019 (Alaska 1996). [2] AS 25.24.160(a)(2) states: (a) In a judgment in an action for divorce or action declaring a marriage void or at any time after judgment, the court may provide (2) for the recovery by one party from the other of an amount of money for maintenance, for a limited or indefinite period of time, in gross or in installments, as may be just and necessary without regard to which of the parties is in fault; an award of maintenance must fairly allocate the economic effect of divorce by being based on a consideration of the following fac | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Merrill v. Merrill
green
1 sentence2015AS 25.24.160(a)(4); Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546 , 547 n.4 (Alaska 1962). 18 Laing v. Laing, 741 P.2d 649, 652 (Alaska 1987). 19 Davila v. Davila, 908 P.2d 1027, 1032 (Alaska 1995) (citing Brooks v. Brooks, 677 P.2d 1230, 1233 (Alaska 1984)). 20 Id. (quoting Lang v. Lang, 741 P.2d 1193, 1195 (Alaska 1987)); see also Lundquist v. Lundquist, 923 P.2d 42, 53-54 (Alaska 1996) (holding there was no error where trial court divided property 50-50 but did not make explicit findings on Merrill factors because “the court’s findings, when read in their entirety, demonstrate that the court considered | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.
green
2 sentences1984To give guidance to courts in applying this balancing test, the Court suggested a consideration of the following factors: (1) maintenance of discipline by immediate superiors; (2) preservation of harmony among co-workers; (3) maintenance of personal loyalty and confidence when necessary to the proper functioning of a close working relationship; (4) maintenance of the employee's proper performance of daily duties; (5) public impact of the statement; (6) impact of the statement on the operation of the governmental entity; and (7) existence or nonexistence of an issue of legitimate public concern 1984To give guidance to courts in applying this balancing test, the Court suggested a consideration of the following factors: (1) maintenance of discipline by immediate superiors; (2) preservation of harmony among co-workers; (3) maintenance of personal loyalty and confidence when necessary to the proper functioning of a close working relationship; (4) maintenance of the employee's proper performance of daily duties; (5) public impact of the statement; (6) impact of the statement on the operation of the governmental entity; and (7) existence or nonexistence of an issue of legitimate public concern | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.