44 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.green2 sentences2026“The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors; the form is immaterial.” Id. 2022The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.” Id. at 183 , citing Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins. | 4 | 26 |
Love v. City of Port Clintongreen2 sentences2021“The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.” Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 , 524 N.E.2d 166 (1988); see also, Doe v. First United Methodist Church, 68 Ohio St.3d 531 , 629 N.E.2d 402 (1994). {¶46} We find that the only possible interpretation of the complaint is that it states a claim for damage to personal property subject to the two-year statute of limitations Guernsey County, Case No. 20CA000011 17 described in R.C. 2305.10(A). 2021“The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.” Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 , 524 N.E.2d 166 (1988); see also, Doe v. First United Methodist Church, 68 Ohio St.3d 531 , 629 N.E.2d 402 (1994). {¶46} We find that the only possible interpretation of the complaint is that it states a claim for damage to personal property subject to the two-year statute of limitations Guernsey County, Case No. 20CA000011 17 described in R.C. 2305.10(A). | 4 | 14 |
Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muethinggreen2 sentences2014The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors[;] the form is immaterial.’” Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muething, 65 Ohio St.3d 273, 277-278 (1992), quoting Hambleton v. R.G. 2001"The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors; the form is immaterial." Id. at 277-278 . | 3 | 10 |
Doe v. First United Methodist Churchgreen2 sentences2021“The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.” Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 , 524 N.E.2d 166 (1988); see also, Doe v. First United Methodist Church, 68 Ohio St.3d 531 , 629 N.E.2d 402 (1994). {¶46} We find that the only possible interpretation of the complaint is that it states a claim for damage to personal property subject to the two-year statute of limitations Guernsey County, Case No. 20CA000011 17 described in R.C. 2305.10(A). 2021“The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.” Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 , 524 N.E.2d 166 (1988); see also, Doe v. First United Methodist Church, 68 Ohio St.3d 531 , 629 N.E.2d 402 (1994). {¶46} We find that the only possible interpretation of the complaint is that it states a claim for damage to personal property subject to the two-year statute of limitations Guernsey County, Case No. 20CA000011 17 described in R.C. 2305.10(A). | 3 | 4 |
Smith v. Katzmangreen1 sentence2011The Brittinghams assert that the claim is one for “ordinary negligence.” The Brittinghams rely on Smith v. Katzman (1992), 81 Ohio App.3d 682, 686 (applying two-year statute of limitations and determining that the “fact that Mr. Smith was required to take the examination as a precondition to Social Security benefits and that its purpose was to obtain information for the Social Security Administration is distinguishable from the diagnosis, care or treatment which constitutes a medical claim”), and New York Central Rd. | 1 | 1 |
Gullatte v. Riongreen1 sentence2002Barry Corp. (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 179 , 183 ; see, also, Gullatte v. Rion (2000), 145 Ohio App.3d 620 , 626 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peterson v. Teodosio
green
2 sentences2022Co., 1 Ohio St.3d 79 , 437 N.E.2d 1194 (1982) and Peterson v. Teodosio, 34 Ohio St.2d 161 , 297 N.E.2d 113 (1973). {¶30} This claim is not subject to the statute of limitations unless and until the trial court determines the meaning of the section and the Trustee fails to abide by that interpretation. 2022Co., 1 Ohio St.3d 79 , 437 N.E.2d 1194 (1982) and Peterson v. Teodosio, 34 Ohio St.2d 161 , 297 N.E.2d 113 (1973). {¶30} This claim is not subject to the statute of limitations unless and until the trial court determines the meaning of the section and the Trustee fails to abide by that interpretation. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.
green
2 sentences2022Co., 1 Ohio St.3d 79 , 437 N.E.2d 1194 (1982) and Peterson v. Teodosio, 34 Ohio St.2d 161 , 297 N.E.2d 113 (1973). {¶30} This claim is not subject to the statute of limitations unless and until the trial court determines the meaning of the section and the Trustee fails to abide by that interpretation. 2022Co., 1 Ohio St.3d 79 , 437 N.E.2d 1194 (1982) and Peterson v. Teodosio, 34 Ohio St.2d 161 , 297 N.E.2d 113 (1973). {¶30} This claim is not subject to the statute of limitations unless and until the trial court determines the meaning of the section and the Trustee fails to abide by that interpretation. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Bear v. Bear
neutral
2 sentences2017Summit No. 26810, 2014-Ohio-2919 , 2014 WL 2986461 , ¶ 23, citing Civ.R. 9(B). {¶ 16} In the present case, Cohen's complaint contains the following five counts: (1) breach of fiduciary duty; (2) aiding, abetting, inducing, or participating in breach of fiduciary duty; (3) waste; (4) deepening insolvency and wrongful prolongation of corporate existence; and (5) breach of fiduciary duty owed to creditors. 2017Summit No. 26810, 2014-Ohio-2919 , 2014 WL 2986461 , at ¶ 18, quoting Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Muething , 65 Ohio St.3d 273 , 277-278, 603 N.E.2d 969 (1992), quoting Hambleton v. R.G. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
William J. Templeman Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
green
1 sentence2013The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial." ' " Id., quoting Love v. Port Clinton, 37 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 (1988), quoting Hambleton v. R.G. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Grover v. Bartsch
green
2 sentences2011The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.’ (Citations omitted).” Grover v. Bartsch, 170 Ohio App.3d 188, 202 , 2006-Ohio-6115, ¶ 52 . {¶ 16} The Brittinghams assert that their negligence claim against Dr. Stull is not a 7 medical claim. “‘Medical claim’ means any claim that is asserted in any civil action against a physician * * * and that arises out of the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of any person. ‘Medical claim’ includes derivative claims for relief that arise from the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a person.” R.C. 2305.11 2011The grounds for bringing the action are the determinative factors, the form is immaterial.’ (Citations omitted).” Grover v. Bartsch, 170 Ohio App.3d 188, 202 , 2006-Ohio-6115, ¶ 52 . {¶ 16} The Brittinghams assert that their negligence claim against Dr. Stull is not a 7 medical claim. “‘Medical claim’ means any claim that is asserted in any civil action against a physician * * * and that arises out of the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of any person. ‘Medical claim’ includes derivative claims for relief that arise from the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a person.” R.C. 2305.11 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Kocak
neutral
2 sentences2009Bar Assn. v. Kocak, 121 Ohio St.3d 396 , 2009-Ohio-1430 , 904 N.E.2d 885 , ¶ 17, quoting Gov.Bar R. 2009Bar Assn. v. Kocak, 121 Ohio St.3d 396 , 2009-Ohio-1430 , 904 N.E.2d 885 , ¶ 17, quoting Gov.Bar R. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.