firm conviction error (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

firm conviction error in Arkansas

43 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2026 8 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Omni Holding & Development Corp. v. C.A.G. Investments, Inc.green
ark · 2007 · cited in 8 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2018
2 sentences

2018Id.

2016Id.

38
Daugherty v. Jacksonville Police Departmentgreen
ark · 2012 · cited in 2 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2019
2 sentences

2019Id. at 5-6, 411 S.W.3d at 199 .

2014See id.

12
Russell v. Watson Chapel School Districtgreen
ark · 2009 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Id. at 5, 313 S.W.3d at 3 .

2014Id. at 5, 313 S.W.3d at 3 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
City of Rockport v. City of Malvern neutral
ark · 2010
2 sentences

2026“A finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with a firm conviction that an error has been committed.” Id.

2025“A finding is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with a firm conviction that an error has been committed.” Id.

72011–2026
El Paso Production Co. v. Blanchard green
ark · 2007
2 sentences

2026Id.

2026Id.

52010–2026
Kasinger v. East End School District ex rel. Board of Directors neutral
arkctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2025Id.

2025Id.

32012–2025
Mauldin v. Snowden green
arkctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2017Mauldin v. Snowden, 2011 Ark.

2016Id.

22016–2017
Fletcher v. Stewart neutral
arkctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2017Fletcher v. Stewart, 2015 Ark.

2016Id.

22016–2017
Duke v. Shinpaugh green
ark · 2009
2 sentences

2009Id.

2009Id.

22009–2009
Williams v. Wayne Farms, LLC green
ark · 2006
2 sentences

2007Id.

2007Id.

22007–2007
Alcoa World Alumina, L.L.C. v. Weiss green
ark · 2010
2 sentences

2024Alcoa World Alumina, L.L.C. v. Weiss, 2010 Ark. 94, at 3 , 377 S.W.3d 164, 166 .

2024Alcoa World Alumina, L.L.C. v. Weiss, 2010 Ark. 94, at 3 , 377 S.W.3d 164, 166 .

12024–2024
Jimmy Marion Baugh v. State of Arkansas green
arkctapp · 2021
1 sentence

2022Id.

12022–2022
Smith v. Smith neutral
arkctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015
Deltic Timber Corp. v. Newland neutral
arkctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2012Id.

12012–2012
Seidenstricker Farms v. DOSS FAMILY TRUST green
ark · 2008
1 sentence

2012Id.

12012–2012
Emerson v. Linkinogger green
arkctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2011Id.

12011–2011
City of Little Rock v. Jung Yul Rhee green
ark · 2009
2 sentences

2010City of Little Rock v. Rhee, 375 Ark. 491 , 292 S.W.3d 292 (2009). 14 Appellant argues that its circumstances do not satisfy the “finally come to rest” requirement of Ark.Code.

2010City of Little Rock v. Rhee, 375 Ark. 491 , 292 S.W.3d 292 (2009). 14 Appellant argues that its circumstances do not satisfy the “finally come to rest” requirement of Ark.Code.

12010–2010
Pulaski County v. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Inc. green
ark · 2007
2 sentences

2008Id.

2008Id.

12008–2008
Taylor v. Hinkle green
ark · 2004
1 sentence

2006Id.

12006–2006

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 6-17-1510 (4) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 18-11-106 (3) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-105 (3) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 6-17-1501 (3) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 6-17-1503 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AR 43 (2006–2026) WV 13 (2003–2026) UT 2 (2006–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check