5 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1964–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Custody of CCRSgreen2 sentences2015See C.C.R.S., 892 P.2d at 256 . 2015See C.C.R.S., 892 P.2d at 256 . | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blankette v. Public Service Co.
green
2 sentences1964The cited case, in part, answered the question as follows: "* * * Under the facts of the case, the law required of the defendant, conducting, as it did, a business so dangerous to the public, the highest degree of care which skill and foresight can attain, consistent with the practical conduct of its business under the known methods and the present state of the particular art." (Emphasis supplied.) This Court again applied the rule of high degree of care in the case of Blankette v. Public Service Co., 90 Colo. 456 , 10 P.2d 327 , the other authority from this state relied upon by the majority 1964The cited case, in part, answered the question as follows: "* * * Under the facts of the case, the law required of the defendant, conducting, as it did, a business so dangerous to the public, the highest degree of care which skill and foresight can attain, consistent with the practical conduct of its business under the known methods and the present state of the particular art." (Emphasis supplied.) This Court again applied the rule of high degree of care in the case of Blankette v. Public Service Co., 90 Colo. 456 , 10 P.2d 327 , the other authority from this state relied upon by the majority | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.