5 Delaware opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Inc."green1 sentence2026Ch. 2012) (“[W]hen there is a reason to conclude that debatable tactical decisions were motivated not by a principled evaluation of the risks and benefits to the company’s stockholders, but by a fiduciary’s consideration of his own financial or other personal self-interests, then the core animating principle of Revlon is implicated.”); In re Toys “R” Us, Inc. S’holder Litig., 877 A.2d 975, 1000 (Del. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation
green
2 sentences2022What typically drives a finding of breach “is evidence of self- interest, undue favoritism or disdain towards a particular bidder, or a similar non- stockholder-motivated influence that calls into question the integrity of the process.” Del 66 Monte, 25 A.3d at 831 . “[W]hen there is a reason to conclude that debatable tactical decisions were motivated not by a principled evaluation of the risks and benefits to the company’s stockholders, but by a fiduciary’s consideration of his own financial or other personal self-interests, then the core animating principle of Revlon is implicated.” El Paso 2021“What typically drives a finding of unreasonableness is evidence of self- interest, undue favoritism or disdain towards a particular bidder, or a similar non- stockholder-motivated influence that calls into question the integrity of the process.” Del Monte, 25 A.3d at 831 . “[W]hen there is a reason to conclude that debatable tactical decisions were motivated not by a principled evaluation of the risks and benefits to the company’s stockholders, but by a fiduciary’s consideration of his own financial or other personal self-interests, then the core animating principle of Revlon is implicated.” | 4 | 2021–2025 |
In Re Del Monte Foods Co. Shareholders Litigation
green
2 sentences2022What typically drives a finding of breach “is evidence of self- interest, undue favoritism or disdain towards a particular bidder, or a similar non- stockholder-motivated influence that calls into question the integrity of the process.” Del 66 Monte, 25 A.3d at 831 . “[W]hen there is a reason to conclude that debatable tactical decisions were motivated not by a principled evaluation of the risks and benefits to the company’s stockholders, but by a fiduciary’s consideration of his own financial or other personal self-interests, then the core animating principle of Revlon is implicated.” El Paso 2021“What typically drives a finding of unreasonableness is evidence of self- interest, undue favoritism or disdain towards a particular bidder, or a similar non- stockholder-motivated influence that calls into question the integrity of the process.” Del Monte, 25 A.3d at 831 . “[W]hen there is a reason to conclude that debatable tactical decisions were motivated not by a principled evaluation of the risks and benefits to the company’s stockholders, but by a fiduciary’s consideration of his own financial or other personal self-interests, then the core animating principle of Revlon is implicated.” | 4 | 2021–2025 |