5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1930–1953 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cary Co. v. Whiting Hyergreen2 sentences1939See Curtis-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 91 Fla. 322 , 107 Sou. 684 .” The bill of complaint does not meet the rule requiring showing of compliance with the provisions of Chapter 17097, supra. Therefore, the order is reversed with directions that the complainant be allowed to amend his bill, if he be so advised, so as to show compliance with the statutory provisions prerequisite to the enforcement of the lien. 1939See Curtis-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 91 Fla. 322 , 107 Sou. 684 .” The bill of complaint does not meet the rule requiring showing of compliance with the provisions of Chapter 17097, supra. Therefore, the order is reversed with directions that the complainant be allowed to amend his bill, if he be so advised, so as to show compliance with the statutory provisions prerequisite to the enforcement of the lien. | 2 | 2 |
Curtiss-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co.green2 sentences1953See Curtiss-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 91 Fla. 354 , 107 So. 679 ." (Emphasis supplied.) *268 The factual situation in the above case was entirely different from the factual situation in the case now under consideration. 1953See Curtiss-Bright Ranch Co. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 91 Fla. 354 , 107 So. 679 ." (Emphasis supplied.) *268 The factual situation in the above case was entirely different from the factual situation in the case now under consideration. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boyer v. Boyer
green
2 sentences1952Southern Paint Manufacturing Company v. Crump, 132 Fla. 799 , 182 So. 291 . 1939Co. v. Crump, 132 Fla. 799 , 182 Sou. 291 , it was held: “A materialman’s lien is strictly statutory and before any person may have such lien the statutory provisions must be strictly complied with and before he can enforce such lien the claimant must allege and prove a strict compliance with every requirement of the statute. | 2 | 1939–1952 |
Southern Paint Mfg. Co. v. Crump
neutral
2 sentences1952Southern Paint Manufacturing Company v. Crump, 132 Fla. 799 , 182 So. 291 . 1939Co. v. Crump, 132 Fla. 799 , 182 Sou. 291 , it was held: “A materialman’s lien is strictly statutory and before any person may have such lien the statutory provisions must be strictly complied with and before he can enforce such lien the claimant must allege and prove a strict compliance with every requirement of the statute. | 2 | 1939–1952 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.