does not meet test in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1942–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Winters v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984 1 sentence 1984See, also, Winters v. State, 425 So.2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) which held: Appellant proffered evidence of some specific consensual sexual activities between the victim and other persons, but this does not meet the test of the statute.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Hodges v. State green fladistctapp · 1980 2 sentences 1984The few isolated instances presented did not present a "pattern of conduct or behavior," see Hodges v. State, 386 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the trial court properly excluded that evidence. 1983The few isolated instances presented did not present a "pattern of conduct or behavior," see Hodges v. State, 386 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), and the trial court properly excluded that evidence.	2	1983–1984
Brevard County v. DHRS green fladistctapp · 1991 1 sentence 1992Brevard County, 589 So.2d at 400 ; Standard 1.7.	1	1992–1992
Wingate and MacH v. MacH green fla · 1934 2 sentences 1990Wingate v. Mach, 117 Fla. 104 , 157 So. 421 (1934). 1990Wingate v. Mach, 117 Fla. 104 , 157 So. 421 (1934).	1	1990–1990
McMillan, Et Vir v. Nelson green fla · 1942 2 sentences 1942This does not meet the rule above stated so as to require this Court to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court.” McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334 , 5 So. (2nd) 867 . 1942This does not meet the rule above stated so as to require this Court to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court.” McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334 , 5 So. (2nd) 867 .	1	1942–1942

Where else courts name it

PA 5 (1908–2024) FL 5 (1942–1992) NY 4 (1948–2009) TX 4 (1945–2009) MS 3 (1993–2004) OH 3 (1988–2008) IL 3 (1966–2012) CT 2 (1981–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check