5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
American Libraries Ass'n v. Patakigreen2 sentences2006The seminal case involving a Dormant Commerce Clause analysis of a state Internet regulation is American Libraries Ass'n v. Pataki, 969 F.Supp. 160, 181 (S.D.N.Y.1997), which involved a New York dissemination statute. 2006The seminal case involving a Dormant Commerce Clause analysis of a state Internet regulation is American Libraries Ass'n v. Pataki, 969 F.Supp. 160, 181 (S.D.N.Y.1997), which involved a New York dissemination statute. | 1 | 1 |
Southeast Booksellers Ass'n v. McMastergreen2 sentences2006Similarly, in Southeast Booksellers Ass'n v. McMaster, 371 F.Supp.2d 773, 786-87 (D.S.C.2005), the district court focused on the unique nature of the Internet in its Dormant Commerce Clause analysis. 2006The court noted that "Internet speakers have no practical, reliable means of determining the geographic location of the recipients of their online communications" nor any way of "ensuring their communications are not accessed in a certain geographic location." Id. at 787 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Heitkamp
red
1 sentence2014Thus, the dormant commerce clause has come to be understood as prohibiting “certain state actions that interfere with interstate commerce.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2014In National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753, 754 , 87 S.Ct. 1389 , 18 L.Ed.2d 505 (1967), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a use tax imposed on customers within the taxing state, where the only contact between the company and the instate customers was “via the United States mail or common carrier.” The Supreme Court found the use tax was in violation of the dormant commerce clause. 2014In National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 386 U.S. 753, 754 , 87 S.Ct. 1389 , 18 L.Ed.2d 505 (1967), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a use tax imposed on customers within the taxing state, where the only contact between the company and the instate customers was “via the United States mail or common carrier.” The Supreme Court found the use tax was in violation of the dormant commerce clause. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Travelscape, LLC v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2013See Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Priceline.com Inc., 2012 WL 3043062 (D.Md., 2012); City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, 2008 WL 2486043 (W.D.Tex.2008); Travelscape, LLC v. S. Carolina Dep’t of Revenue, 391 S.C. 89 , 705 S.E.2d 28 (2011). 2013See Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Priceline.com Inc., 2012 WL 3043062 (D.Md., 2012); City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, 2008 WL 2486043 (W.D.Tex.2008); Travelscape, LLC v. S. Carolina Dep’t of Revenue, 391 S.C. 89 , 705 S.E.2d 28 (2011). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison
green
2 sentences2008Cf. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564, 579-80 , 117 S.Ct. 1590 , 137 L.Ed.2d 852 (1997) (holding that states are free to impose generally applicable non-discriminatory tax burdens, as long as those burdens do not run afoul of the dormant commerce clause). 2008Cf. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564, 579-80 , 117 S.Ct. 1590 , 137 L.Ed.2d 852 (1997) (holding that states are free to impose generally applicable non-discriminatory tax burdens, as long as those burdens do not run afoul of the dormant commerce clause). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
American Booksellers Foundation v. Dean
green
2 sentences2006In American Booksellers Foundation v. Dean, 342 F.3d 96 (2d Cir.2003), the Second Circuit concluded that the Vermont dissemination statute violated the Dormant Commerce Clause because of its extraterritorial effect. 2006In American Booksellers Foundation v. Dean, 342 F.3d 96 (2d Cir.2003), the Second Circuit concluded that the Vermont dissemination statute violated the Dormant Commerce Clause because of its extraterritorial effect. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cashatt v. State
green
1 sentence2004We affirm the trial court's ruling rejecting the dormant commerce clause challenge against section 847.0135, in count one, in accordance with this court's recent ruling in Cashatt v. State, 873 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding that section 847.0135 does not violate the commerce clause). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.