5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Presbyterian Homes of Synod of Fla., Inc.green1 sentence2004See Johnson v. Presbyterian Homes, 239 So.2d at 261 ; Silver Rose, 646 So.2d at 251 ; Rice v. State, 754 So.2d at 883 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Douglas E. Brown Katherine E. Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified School District, Woodland Parents Group, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
green
2 sentences1996Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified School Dist., 27 F.3d 1373 (9th Cir.1994) (holding, applying the Lemon test, that a teaching curriculum which asks children to discuss witches or pretend they are witches or sorcerers, does not require children to practice the "religion" of witchcraft in violation of the federal establishment clause or the California Constitution). 1996Brown v. Woodland Joint Unified School Dist., 27 F.3d 1373 (9th Cir.1994) (holding, applying the Lemon test, that a teaching curriculum which asks children to discuss witches or pretend they are witches or sorcerers, does not require children to practice the “religion” of witchcraft in violation of the federal establishment clause or the California Constitution). | 2 | 1996–1996 |
Nohrr v. Brevard County Educational Fac. Auth.
green
2 sentences2010In Nohrr , the court held that the State’s higher education bonds could issue to aid religious schools and secular schools without offending the establishment clause or article I, section three. 247 So.2d at 306-07 . 2010In Nohrr , the court held that the State's higher education bonds could issue to aid religious schools and secular schools without offending the establishment clause or article I, section three. 247 So.2d at 306-07 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Rice v. State
green
1 sentence2004See Johnson v. Presbyterian Homes, 239 So.2d at 261 ; Silver Rose, 646 So.2d at 251 ; Rice v. State, 754 So.2d at 883 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Silver Rose Entertain. v. Clay County
green
1 sentence2004See Johnson v. Presbyterian Homes, 239 So.2d at 261 ; Silver Rose, 646 So.2d at 251 ; Rice v. State, 754 So.2d at 883 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Bowen v. Kendrick
green
2 sentences2000"Under the Lemon standard ... a court may invalidate a statute only if [the statute] is motivated wholly by an impermissible purpose, if its primary effect is the advancement of religion, or if it requires excessive entanglement between church and state." Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988) (citations omitted). 2000"Under the Lemon standard ... a court may invalidate a statute only if [the statute] is motivated wholly by an impermissible purpose, if its primary effect is the advancement of religion, or if it requires excessive entanglement between church and state." Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589, 602 , 108 S.Ct. 2562 , 101 L.Ed.2d 520 (1988) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Lemon v. Kurtzman
red
2 sentences2000In order to overcome a claim that a statute violates the federal establishment clause, the statute must pass the three-part test set out in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2105 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971). 2000In order to overcome a claim that a statute violates the federal establishment clause, the statute must pass the three-part test set out in Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 91 S.Ct. 2105 , 29 L.Ed.2d 745 (1971). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.