information pursuant rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

information pursuant rule in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Walthourgreen
fladistctapp · 2004 · cited in 3 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2010–2015
2 sentences

2011The purpose of a motion to dismiss an information pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4) is to “ascertain whether the undisputed facts which the State will rely on to prove its case, establish a prima facie case, as a matter of law, so as to permit a jury to determine the defendant guilty of the crime charged.” Lowe v. State, 40 So.3d 789, 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), quoting State v. Walthowr, 876 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

2010A motion to dismiss an information pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4) functions to “ascertain whether the undisputed facts which the State will rely on to prove its case, establish a prima facie case, as a matter of law, so as to permit a jury to determine the defendant guilty of the crime charged.” State v. Walthour, 876 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

33
BONGE v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2015
2 sentences

2015As previously noted by this court in Bonge v. State, 53 So.3d 1231, 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011): The purpose of a motion to dismiss an information pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4)' is to ‘ascertain whether the undisputed facts which the.

2013As we have previously explained, “[t]he purpose of a motion to dismiss an information pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4) is to ‘ascertain whether the undisputed facts which the State will rely on to prove its case, establish a prima facie case, as a matter of law, so as to permit a jury to determine the defendant guilty of the crime charged.’ ” Bonge v. State, 53 So.3d 1231, 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citation omitted).

22
Lowe v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2010 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2011–2015
2 sentences

2015State will rely on to prove its case, establish a prima facie case, as a matter of law, so as to permit a jury to determine the defendant guilty of the crime charged.’ Lowe v. State, 40 So.3d 789, 791 (Fla.5th DCA 2010), quoting State v. Walthour, 876 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

2011The purpose of a motion to dismiss an information pursuant to rule 3.190(c)(4) is to “ascertain whether the undisputed facts which the State will rely on to prove its case, establish a prima facie case, as a matter of law, so as to permit a jury to determine the defendant guilty of the crime charged.” Lowe v. State, 40 So.3d 789, 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), quoting State v. Walthowr, 876 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

22
State v. Bonebrightgreen
fladistctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019State v. Bonebright, 742 So. 2d 290, 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

FL 5 (2010–2019) IA 2 (2018–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check