Jacobs claim (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

Jacobs claim in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Estate of Smithgreen
fladistctapp · 1968 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994See In re Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Woldseth v. State green
fladistctapp · 2018
2 sentences

2022A second example is Mr. Jacobs’ claim that Sorenson v. Bank of New York Mellon as trustee for Certificate Holders CWALAT, Inc., 261 So. 3d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) “carve[s] out” a right for him to “allege the rubberstamped blank endorsement on his promissory note is a forgery and to conduct discovery to prove that it is a forgery.” Mr. Jacobs’ Motion at 28.

2022First, Mr. Jacobs’ motion “certifies” that our decision “expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of the Second District which held the trial court abused its discretion to deny leave to plead or prove this same evidence of standing was fraudulently created,” citing Sorenson v. Bank of New York Mellon as trustee for Certificate Holders CWALAT, Inc., 261 So. 3d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

22022–2022
Jacobs v. State green
fladistctapp · 1990
1 sentence

1993We distinguished Williams from Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), a case where we found reversible error in a video sentencing procedure, by pointing out that the defendant in Jacobs did not sign a waiver agreement nor did the Jacobs defendant have private access to confer with his counsel.

11993–1993
Adams v. State green
fla · 1986
1 sentence

1988Adams v. State, 490 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1986).

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

PA 8 (1912–2020) CA 7 (1969–2024) GA 7 (2004–2017) FL 5 (1988–2022) MN 5 (1991–2015) TX 5 (2001–2018) OH 4 (1994–2013) AL 2 (1979–1979) AR 2 (2000–2006) NJ 2 (2000–2019) IN 2 (2009–2015) WI 2 (1994–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check