5 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mininni v. Gillumgreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., Mininni, 477 So. 2d at 1015 . 8 The instant case, by contrast, involves the State’s motion for pretrial detention pursuant to section 907.041(5)(d), which is premised upon the second clause of Article I, section 14 of the Florida Constitution: “If no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process, the accused may be detained.” There is nothing in the plain language of 907.041(5)(d), or its procedural counterpart, Florida Rule of Criminal Pro | 1 | 1 |
Keane v. Cochrangreen2 sentences2011At the pretrial detention hearing, the State provided the court with evidence that was not presented to the first appearance judge. 1 See Keane v. Cochran, 614 So.2d 1186, 1187-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“In order to have good cause to modify a bond, the state must present evidence of a change in circumstances or information not made known to the first appearance judge.”). 2011At the pretrial detention hearing, the State provided the court with evidence that was not presented to the first appearance judge. [1] See Keane v. Cochran, 614 So.2d 1186, 1187-88 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) ("In order to have good cause to modify a bond, the state must present evidence of a change in circumstances or information not made known to the first appearance judge."). | 1 | 1 |
Hernandez v. Rothgreen1 sentence2006See Hernandez v. Roth, 890 So.2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) ("Matters relating to the setting of bail and the conditions attached to a defendant's pre-trial release on bail are reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Houser v. Manning
green
2 sentences2000We certified conflict with Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). 1999The state urges us to adopt the Third District Court of Appeal's position recently enunciated in Houser v. Manning, 719 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). | 2 | 1999–2000 |
Castro v. State
green
1 sentence2006As we explained in Castro v. State, 914 So.2d 467 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005): We suspect that some of the position articulated by Mr. Castro grows out of the differences between Rules 3.131(a) and 3.132(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and the fact that the trial court apparently decided to hold a hearing to set bond, and a pretrial detention hearing at the same time. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.